The Security of Free Software
,----[ Headings ]
| 1 SECURE FREEDOM
|
| 1.1 "TRUE FREENESS"
|
| 1.2 "THE COMMUNITY EFFECT"
|
| 2 SECURE TECHNOLOGY
|
| 2.1 "GIVEN ENOUGH EYEBALLS ALL BUGS ARE SHALLOW"
|
| 2.2 "TESTED BY THE BEST"
`----
http://www.libervis.com/article/the_security_of_free_software
[Security:] Mozilla Thunderbird vs. Microsoft Outlook
,----[ Quote ]
| For me, I’m going to stick with anything but Outlook for email for the
| reasons I’ve cited above.
`----
http://www.esecurityplanet.com/article.php/3702831
Outlook -- the botmaster-friendly mail client.
Related:
How secure are Linux, Window and Mac OS?
http://www.masuran.org/node/29
Why Windows is less secure than Linux
http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/?p=311
Linux more secure than Windows, national survey shows
http://www.xomba.com/linux_more_secure_than_windows_national_survey_shows
Microsoft Windows: Insecure by Design
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A34978-2003Aug23?language=printer
If Only We Knew Then What We Know Now About Windows XP
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/23/AR2006092300510.html?nav=rss_technology
Why Windows is a security nightmare.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/05/21/1085120110704.html
The Structural Failures of Windows
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=15305
Linux Security: A Big Edge Over Windows
http://www.linuxinsider.com/rsstory/54742.html
|
|
