Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: More Questions Raised About Mono's Agenda

On Oct 30, 2:43 pm, Erik Funkenbusch <e...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:09:11 +0100, Jim Relsh wrote:
> > "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht
> >news:4409392.pQp5N9ZnWq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Miguel's delusions of grandeur
>
> >> ,----[ Quote ]
> >>| What is Miguel de Icaza's latest game? His obsession with tailgating
> >>| everything that Microsoft develops - and trying to impress the company
> >> by
> >>| producing Linux equivalents - now seems to be spreading to others as
> >> well.
> >> `----
>
> > I agree with the author. Miguel is too smart to do such stupd things without
> > some ulterior motive.
>
> .net is a *good* technical solution.  Miguel sees that.  Everyone is
> jumping down his throat for non-technical reasons.  Not a single person has
> come up with any valid criticisms of .net from a technical perspective.
>

Would you consider single-provider and vendor lock-in to be technical
reasons?

Are interoperability and the need to be standards-based technical
reasons?

Are you saying that the requirement of having access to source code is
a religious reason?

-Ramon




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index