"Mark Kent" <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:g4mgv4-84q.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> ____/ Mark Kent on Monday 29 October 2007 08:16 : \____
>>
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>> ____/ Mark Kent on Saturday 27 October 2007 09:59 : \____
>>>>
>>>>> Sophie McDowell <sophie@xxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Kier" <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:pan.2007.10.25.12.17.42.909278@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:52:07 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ____/ Mark Kent on Thursday 25 October 2007 08:29 : \____
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What will you say when the last technical people at the BBC are
>>>>>>>>> given
>>>>>>>>> their P.45s?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am not allowed to comment on this in detail, but it turns out
>>>>>>>> that the
>>>>>>>> crooks
>>>>>>>> at the BBC have become quite fearful of this reaction. Apparently,
>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>> too real.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 'Not allowed' by whom, exactly?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Roy's failure to answer this simple question noted.
>>>>
>>>> My previous message explains just why.
>>>>
>>>>> Gary, even my little sister only changed her name once when she was 12
>>>>> or 13. You seem to do it several times a week. Get help, please?
>>>>
>>>> He already did. He's seeing a professional, but progress is evidently
>>>> too
>>>> slow.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is he? Good for him. I sincerely hope it helps; his current state of
>>> mind is clearly not good.
>>>
>>> I imagine that it could take some time to achieve a recovery, though.
>>> Perhaps we could at least encourage him to post under his own name?
>>> Maybe even some on-topic, non-anti-charter material?
>>
>> He'd better not actually. If he stopped posting from open relays
>> (zombies), it
>> would be easier for people to sue him for libel, having gone through it
>> all
>> these years. As for him name, it's already known and there's too much
>> proof
>> for him to deny it.
>
> There's no point suing people who have no money. I don't think our Gary
> would be worth the effort in that respect.
>
>>
>> Good luck with the shrink, Gary Stewart. I heard it's a female, so
>> there's no
>> danger of you having lust for her.
>>
>
> It's hard to say; if he's quite schizophrenic, he might do at times,
> depending on "who" is in charge at the time. If he's merely
> sociopathic, then perhaps not.
>
Aren't you the hypocrite that constantly tries to lecture people about
posting on-topic material and refraining from personal attacks.
Yes Mark Kent, *YOU* are that hypocrite. Good to see that you don't engage
in personal attacks - not.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
