____/ Peter Köhlmann on Monday 29 October 2007 10:41 : \____
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> ____/ Peter Köhlmann on Monday 29 October 2007 09:35 : \____
>>
>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> ____/ Gene Jones on Monday 29 October 2007 06:05 : \____
>>>>
>>>>> Peter K�ann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1195031&tstart=0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So much for the "superior" quality of apple software
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They are every bit as incompetent as their Redmond counterparts
>>>>>
>>>>> sorry peter, it had nothing to do with apple.
>>>>>
>>>>> the company Unsanity has now apologized:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://unsanity.org/
>>>>
>>>> You're actually right on this one, but it's a shame that Apple did not
>>>> test the build sufficiently in order to identify the conflict and
>>>> resolve it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It is a shame also that apparently they changed significant amounts of
>>> code without providing the changes to 3rd-party developers to let them
>>> test/change their products.
>>> In either case, apple is responsible. They should make sure that
>>> their "upgrade" does not cripple the machine just because a widely used
>>> 3rd-party "enhancer" is installed.
>>> The "upgrade" should check for it and disable it or at least give a
>>> clearly worded (it's apple users, after all) warning
>>
>> I think there was an open test version (several even, distributed via
>> Torrent). How come nobody spotted this conflict before the release?
>
> Because apple changed so much between the last RC and the gold code
>
> < snip >
Or maybe no-one was willing to be the slave (tester) of a multi-billion dollar
company that is so arrogant...?
--
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | Useless fact: 21978 x 4 = 21978 backwards
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU is Not UNIX | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine
|
|
