Mark Kent wrote:
> Jim Richardson <warlock@xxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:24:28 +0100,
>> Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:05:59 +0100, spike1 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> did eloquently scribble:
>>>>> Why should I talk off-group to someone who lies about me and puts
>>>>> works in my mouth? Show me where I 'justified MS' in schools, or
>>>>> anywhere else. Ever. Show me how I'm a 'proprietary software plant'.
>>>>
>>>> You've said something bad about the GPL3 haven't you...
>>>
>>> Don't recall so. I'm fairly neutral about that issue, actually; I can
>>> see both good and bad in it.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Doesn't matter what it is, MK doesn't take disagreement well. Especially
>> if you are right, and he's wrong (for a great example of that, see his
>> claims/dancing about the UK law on renouncing/losing citizenship)
>>
>
> Oh dear, you *still* don't understand that, then?
>
> I gave you the reference about the difference between subjects and
> citizens. Was the english to hard to grasp?
>
Erik F taught you well in weasel wording, youg apprentice
--
No trees were destroyed in the sending of this message, however, a
significant number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
|
|
