EU: Microsoft's EU patent pledge 'incompatible with Open Source'
,----[ Quote ]
| The changes mandated by the European Commission in Microsoft's
| interoperability licences will continue to block Open Source developers,
| legal experts on this type of software say.
|
| "The agreement is going to run foul of the GPL," IT news site VNUNet quotes
| Mark Webbink, the director of the Software Freedom Law Center. The GNU
| General Public License is one of the most used Open Source licences.
`----
http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/en/document/7261/469
Microsoft's trick revealed.
Microsoft and open-source backers: best 'frenemies' forever?
,----[ Quote ]
| "Microsoft appears to have accepted that Linux - on servers and devices at
| least, if not the desktop - cannot be completely stopped," said Daniel Egger,
| CEO of consulting firm Open Source Risk Management.
`----
http://www.techworld.com/opsys/features/index.cfm?featureID=3762&pagtype=all
Related:
Microsoft's EU patent pledge incompatible with GPL
,----[ Quote ]
| Linux vendors will be unable to license Microsoft's interoperability patents
| under the terms that were mandated by the European Commission, open source
| legal experts argue.
|
| It is claimed that the the terms are incompatible with the General Public
| Licence (GPL), the licence that governs the Linux operating system.
`----
http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2201856/microsoft-eu-patent-pledge
Is Microsoft’s Europe agreement a big deal?
,----[ Quote ]
| If open source developers find greater protection for their work and its
| results in Europe than in America that’s where they will gravitate. That’s
| the kind of regime the EU is trying to create. We ignore that and dismiss
| that at our peril.
`----
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=1584
Half A Loaf
,----[ Quote ]
| Yes, open source will have access to the interoperability information
| on "reasonable" terms (ask independent open source developers how many can
| afford to cough up the $15,000 such access will cost), but nothing in this
| statement indicates the Commission has overcome Microsoft's "refusa[al] to
| make the [patent] licence compatible with the open source business model." In
| fact, we can expect that nothing about that patent license will be compatible
| with the most widely used open source license, the GNU General Public
| License.
`----
http://walkingwithelephants.blogspot.com/2007/10/half-loaf.html
EU tells open source to start paying MS patent tax
,----[ Quote ]
| EU Commissioner Kroes' deal with Microsoft creates real dangers to Europe's
| growing open source economy, warns the FFII. Using patent licenses that
| exclude businesses, the software monopolist has turned the EU competition
| ruling into a victory, and now gets implicit support from the Commission to
| proceed aggressively against its competitors.
`----
http://press.ffii.org/Press_releases/EU_tells_open_source_to_start_paying_MS_patent_tax
Late night baseball games, Microsoft concessions evoke big yawns at open source
water cooler
,----[ Quote ]
| It will benefit purveyors of proprietary software but not open source
| developers, agreed Michael Goulde, analyst of open source strategy at
| Forrester Research, Cambridge, Mass. “Some open source developers believe
| that Microsoft should make its protocols available for use royalty free. In
| some cases, there are open source license restrictions that make it not
| possible for the software to include Microsoft licensed code – because you
| can’t downstream the license. So, unless Microsoft goes way beyond what it
| has agreed with the EU to do, only a subset of open source developers will
| have much interest. They’ll continue reverse engineering Microsoft protocols
| and doing the best they can."
`----
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=1582
Let's Make a Deal - The MS-EU Settlement
,----[ Quote ]
| The patent part is terrible. Worse than terrible. They are not blocked from
| offering patent deals, only constrained as to how much to charge for a
| license, which is not and never was the issue. So they'll beef up those
| initiatives, I'm sure. However, the good part is that they were compelled to
| separate the patent license offer out and make it optional. Thanks, but no
| thanks.
|
| [...]
|
| I'm guessing Microsoft lawyers are high fiving each other, having snatched an
| important victory from utter and total defeat. The rest is excellent, of
| course, and in no way do I mean to detract from the hard work and persistence
| that the EU Commission has shown. However, I don't think they understand how
| seriously broken the US patent system is currently, and how easy it is to
| abuse it, or they don't feel it's their job to fix the US problems, or how
| central patents are to Microsoft's current strategy against FOSS.
`----
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071022114731199
|
|
