Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Microsoft Tries the Same Fraud in Norway, But Norway Says "No" to Monopoly Abuser

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] Microsoft Tries the Same Fraud in Norway, But Norway Says "No" to Monopoly Abuser
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 01:03:41 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
Manipulation in Norway.

Norway and OOXML

,----[ Quote ]
| "There is now a report from Norway on how Microsoft rallied its partners to
| try to get a favorable vote on MSOOXML."
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=200708301301334

Norway Decides: No with Comments on OOXML and a Hint from Hungary

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070831115138106

norway says no to ooxml

,----[ Quote ]
| Standard Norge actually gives a conditioned yes to OOXML, but that's a big NO 
| with comments. What does it mean? It means that Microsoft have to fix all the 
| comments before it can be approved as a ISO standard.  
`----

http://phun-ky.net/2007/08/norway-says-no-to-ooxml

ODF vs. OOXML: Microsoft Has Mastered the Art of Unfair Play (Updated)

,----[ Quote ]
| The adoption of a standard is supposed to be an open, transparent process. 
| Any companies interested in participating in the standard setting process in 
| any significant way have to pay a fee to get a seat at the table. Many 
| companies played by the rules and participated in the process. And it was 
| becoming clear that Microsoft was not getting there way. In the recent vote 
| in Sweden, it looked like Microsoft was going to lose. So what does Microsoft 
| do? They pull the cards out of their sleeve and in a way that competing 
| interests have no time to react. . Out of nowhere, Microsoft Business 
| Partners are ponying up the $US2,444 to get a vote just in time for the vote. 
| The final vote was in favor of Microsoft: 25 Yes, 6 No and 3 Abstentions.         
`----

http://www.controlscaddy.com/A55A69/bccaddyblog.nsf/plinks/CBYE-76JGCQ

Bribery. Kickbacks with partners.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index