In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Peter Köhlmann
<peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:40:29 +0200
<fcupcd$a3m$00$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
>
>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Ofc. Michael Clayton
>> <clayton@xxxxxxxx>
>> wrote
>> on Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:47:33 -0400
>> <46f2d068$0$23395$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:1228466.2XnXmBCqho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> Free software made mandatory: IT practicals of SSLC Exam
>>>
>>> "Free software made mandatory" - Does anyone else see the hypocrisy in
>>> this?
>>>
>>
>> True. However, there's also the little question as to how
>> to properly validate software so that it meets standards.
>>
>> How bad is it out there?
>>
>> http://www.webstandards.org/action/acid2/
>>
>> Opera passes. IE 6 bombs. Firefox mangles. Dillo and
>> Lynx don't even understand the question (in their defense,
>> they weren't designed to).
>>
>
> Konqueror passes (and was in fact one of the first browsers to pass)
Ye gods, forgot all about him. I've been running Gnome
too long. :-)
Passes with flying colors, except that his head gets
shaved for some reason if I shrink the window too much.
Turns out Opera has a similar problem.
So much for Microsoft "innovation"...unless it includes
munging up standard (if highly contrived for the purposes
of testing) web pages.
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows. Multi-platform(1), multi-tasking(1), multi-user(1).
(1) if one defines "multi" as "exactly one".
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
