Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Microrosft Ignored Rival Platform, Now Forced to Interoperate

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] Microrosft Ignored Rival Platform, Now Forced to Interoperate
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:23:05 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
At Arm's Length

,----[ Quote ]
| But if Microsoft is reaching out to embrace the open source world with the 
| left hand, with its right hand it continues to hold them at bay. Microsoft 
| has a long history of treating platforms other than Windows like red-headed 
| step-children-acknowledging they exist while at the same time making sure 
| everyone knows they aren't really part of the family. In fact, an old joke 
| used to say that it was obvious that Microsoft supported cross-platform 
| development: you could use Windows XP or Windows 2000.      
`----

http://mcpmag.com/columns/article.asp?EditorialsID=2238

Microsoft Must Share Code With Rivals

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft lost its appeal of a European antitrust order Monday that obliges 
| the technology giant to share communications code with rivals... 
`----

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070917/D8RN77CG0.html


Related:

Halloween Memo I Confirmed and Microsoft's History on Standards

,----[ Quote ]
|  By the way, if you are by any chance trying to figure out Microsoft's policy 
|  toward standards, particularly in the context of ODF-EOXML, that same 
|  Microsoft page is revelatory, Microsoft's answer to what the memo meant when 
|  it said that Microsoft could extend standard protocols so as to deny 
|  Linux "entry into the market":    
|
|    Q: The first document talked about extending standard protocols as a way 
|    to "deny OSS projects entry into the market." What does this mean? 
|
|    A: To better serve customers, Microsoft needs to innovate above standard 
|    protocols. By innovating above the base protocol, we are able to deliver 
|    advanced functionality to users. An example of this is adding 
|    transactional support for DTC over HTTP. This would be a value-add and 
|    would in no way break the standard or undermine the concept of standards, 
|    of which Microsoft is a significant supporter. Yet it would allow us to 
|    solve a class of problems in value chain integration for our Web-based 
|    customers that are not solved by any public standard today. Microsoft 
|    recognizes that customers are not served by implementations that are 
|    different without adding value; we therefore support standards as the 
|    foundation on which further innovation can be based.          
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070127202224445 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index