Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [SOT] 'Protecting' "What We Do" (Patents Go Mad)

Can We Protect How We Do What We Do? A Consideration of Business Method Patents
in Australia and Europe

,----[ Quote ]
| This paper reviews the availability of business method patents in Australia 
| in light of the 2006 decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court in Grant 
| v Commissioner of Patents,5 which confirmed the need in Australia for 
| a ‘useful product’ to issue from the working of a method (business or 
| otherwise) in order for the method to be patentable.    
`----

http://ijlit.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/16/1/96


Yesterday:

Method and instrument for proposing marriage to an individual 

,----[ Quote ]
| The purpose of this invention is to provide an improved method of proposing 
| marriage to an individual. The method of proposing to an individual generally 
| comprising the steps of meeting the individual; exchanging names with the 
| individual; dating the individual (not necessary); drafting a government 
| document having a proposal to marry the individual incorporated therein; and 
| showing the government document to the individual. The government document 
| may be a patent application. The patent application may claim the method by 
| which the proposor will make a marriage proposal to the individual. The 
| proposor could then use the method claimed in the patent application to 
| propose to the individual. The patent application could be the actual 
| marriage proposal.          
`----

http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=20070078663.PGNR.&OS=DN/20070078663&RS=DN/20070078663

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index