On 2008-04-05, Ezekiel <a@xxxxx> wrote:
>
> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1354243.hllUsPHVgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [Sarcasm] Why I Really Hate Linux: Substitute Applications
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | Kidding aside (I know I'm 3 days late), Amarok seriously does have all
>> these
>> | features. In addition, I'm running 4 scripts (911tabs, Tag Clouds, BPM
>> Calc,
>> | and amaKode), and it still takes up less RAM than iTunes did on Windows.
>> | Plus, it has support for dynamic and static playlists like iTunes, along
>> with
>> | a tagging system. Everything in it is very tightly integrated, as well.
>> `----
>>
>> http://distrogue.blogspot.com/2008/04/why-i-really-hate-linux-substitute.html
>
> Well it's certainly just about "the features" - Who cares if a craplication
> like "Amarok" is unstable, ugly and confusing to use. iTunes simply works
...you will have to be a bit more precise than that.
Vague rhetoric is not a rebuttal.
> great and is used by millions and millions of people around the world.
> Amarok is some hackware that tries to cram everything including the kitchen
> sink into a undecipherable mess.
--
If you think that an 80G disk can hold HUNDRENDS of |||
hours of DV video then you obviously haven't used iMovie either. / | \
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
|
|
