Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Microsoft and Partners Under European Grilling After OOXML Crimes

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] Microsoft and Partners Under European Grilling After OOXML Crimes
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 06:59:44 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
EU investigation into Open XML vote still ongoing

,----[ Quote ]
| The effort stems from a complaint lodged by anti-Microsoft lobbying group 
| ECIS (European Commission for Interoperable Systems). The Commission said in 
| January that it is exploring whether the Open XML file formats are 
| sufficiently interoperable with competitors' products.   
| 
| The Wall Street Journal in February reported that the investigation had 
| started. 
| In a letter seen by CNET News.com, European regulators queried the national 
| standards body in Norway to gain details into the local standardization 
| process. Specifically, the European Commission sought information on attempts 
| to influence the debate or vote over the standards proposal.   
| 
| In response, Standards Norway said there was heated debate but not 
| any "inappropriate behavior that endangered our process," according to a 
| document seen by CNET News.com.   
`----

http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9909499-7.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=NewsBlog

Lots of damage done to Microsoft's image and legal status:

What the OOXML fiasco can teach us

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft's promises about changing its skin (becoming more "open") fit this 
| patterm very well. But after the company, using methods that can only be 
| described as dubious, muscled through its Office Open XML document format as 
| an ISO standard, no-one will ever be able to claim that it has changed in any 
| way since it was set up in 1975.    
| 
| It has always used tactics like this - winning is important and it doesn't 
| matter how one does it. There are plenty of promises at the start but then 
| when it comes down to the knuckle-duster stage, the ugly side of Redmond 
| manifests itself and it's a win-at-all-costs game. After that, we get pious 
| statements.    
`----

http://www.itwire.com/content/view/17458/1090/

[Sarcasm] Congrats to the OOXML Team!

,----[ Quote ]
| Thanks Microsoft, for demonstrating just how far you are willing to go to get 
| your way in the marketplace. Having determined that your format could not be 
| approved on technical merit, you blatantly gamed the ISO system to push it 
| through anyway. Good for you.   
| 
| Now you have given the world a standard that is cumbersome, possibly broken, 
| and very likely not really open enough to be used by any company other than 
| its author. Congratulations!  
| 
| Because now, like it or not, you will ultimately be held responsible for your 
| actions. Entire nations are looking askance at this standard and your 
| practices. Very soon, I believe, entire nations are going to start looking 
| for alternatives to your brand of software lock-in, as they discover just 
| how "good" OOXML really is.    
`----

http://blog.linuxtoday.com/blog/archives/080402-100013.html


Related:

EU Initiates Investigation Against Microsoft OOXML Push

,----[ Quote ]
| But with Steve Ballmer taking over as CEO, there was supposed to be a kinder, 
| gentler Microsoft - one that would play nicely with its competitors.  When 
| antitrust regulators in turn challenged this new Microsoft, it issued not 
| challenges to fight to the end to prove that it had done nothing illegal, but 
| statements promising to "cooperate fully."    
| 
| But at the same time, Microsoft is still a tough competitor.  As Microsoft's 
| Director of Corporate Standards Jason Matusow famously warned at his blog 
| last year:  
| 
|     Make no mistake; all parties are looking at the full picture to find 
|     strategies that will result in the outcome they desire. Provided - of 
|     course - that they do so within the context of the rules that apply to 
|     the process, this is exactly what one should expect to happen. It is 
|     going to be a very interesting next few months.    
| 
| Indeed, the months that followed proved to be interesting indeed.  Microsoft 
| said that some of its employees became over zealous, most flagrantly in 
| Sweden, where marketing assists were promised to several business partners as 
| incentives to join the national standards committee and vote for OOXM.   
`----

http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080208082501776


EU Commission Investigating Microsoft's MSOOXML Push

,----[ Quote ]
| I hope they think to investigate the smear campaigns that seem to always 
| happen to anyone on the other side from Microsoft. What happened to Peter 
| Quinn was by no means unique.  
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080208151410252


Corrupt countries were more likely to support the OOXML document format

,----[ Quote ]
| Is this just a random coincidence? The median of the CPI index of the above 
| mentioned 70 countries is 3.95. Of the most corrupted half (CPI index less 
| than 3.95) 23 or 77% voted for approval (approval or approval with comments) 
| and 7 or 23% for disapproval; 5 abstained. Of the least corrupted half (CPI 
| index more than 3.95) 13 or 54% voted for approval and 11 or 46% voted for 
| disapproval; 11 abstained - see the table below.      
`----

http://www.effi.org/blog/kai-2007-09-05.en.html


Microsoft accused of more OOXML standards fiddling 

,----[ Quote ]
| However the 11 new countries are refusing to say how they will vote. These 
| include Cote d'Ivoire, Cyprus, Ecuador, Jamaica, Lebanon, Malta, Pakistan, 
| Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Uruguay and Venezuela. Most people seem to think 
| that these have been put there by Vole to make sure the standard gets pushed 
| through.    
`----

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=42106

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index