On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 06:53:39 -0700, cc wrote:
> On Apr 27, 9:38Â am, William Poaster <w...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 04:33:37 -0600, High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> > Homer wrote:
>>
>> >> [Irrelevant X-Posting snipped]
>> >>> Verily I say unto thee, that Borked Pseudo Mailed spake
>> >> thusly:
>>
>> > [Irrelevant non-Linux advocacy content snipped]
>>
>> >> That address is 5 years out of date. My new address (for Usenet
>> >> contact) is <use...@xxxxxxxxxx>.
>>
>> > Trolls are getting stupider every day. Â Whilst Googling, I found this
>> > boneheaded answer from [H]adron:
>>
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/
>>
>> msg/00dd56c5a729a882?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >>http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/signature-faq/
>>
>> >>> ,---- THE ABSOLUTE BASICS: Get thee to thy home directory and
>> >>> therein edit thyself a file. Â Name it `.signature'. Remember that
>> >>> inews and other news systems (the ones that make up the majority of
>> >>> the news software on Usenet, actually) will cut off everything after
>> >>> the fourth line, so it's good to stay below that limit.
>> >> `----
>>
>> >> But yours: ,---- -- K.http://slated.org
>>
>> >>> .----
>> >>>> 'When it comes to knowledge, "ownership" just doesn't make sense' ~
>> >>>> Cory Doctorow, The Guardian.http://tinyurl.com/22bgx8
>> >>> `----
>>
>> >>> Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) on sky, running kernel 2.6.23.8-63.fc8
>> >>> 15:54:40 up 127 days, 12:30, Â 4 users, Â load average: 0.08, 0.09,
>> >>> 0.07 [[End of PGP Signed Part]]
>> >> `----
>>
>> >> Kindly learnt to respect Usenet standards. No one is interested in
>> >> your "up time".
>>
>> > This is an example of (along with others that describes the abuser):
>>
>> HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
>> <quote>
>> Kindly learnt to respect Usenet standards. <unquote>
>>
>> That's rich coming from an idiotic troll like Quack!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/
>>
>>> [quote]
>>> 7.6 Trespasser Disinformation Tactics
<SNIP>
>>> 45. Criticize Linux Advocates but ignore anti-Linux propagandist
>>> transgressions. Always criticize the behavior of Linux Advocates, but,
>>> ignore the same and even worse transgressions are being committed by
>>> your fellow Trespassers. [/quote]
>>
>>> 127 days up time is very good considering it is a personal use system.
>>> I shut down my Ubuntu desktop system daily, there's no need t support
>>> more than 1 user at a time. Â There's no need to keep things up all
>>> night to push patches, because Microsoft Systems Management Server
>>> 2003 is incapable of "Wake on LAN" without 3rd party assistance. Â
>>> (Green standard has been around for a while, like 1995?)
>>
> Your insistence on contributing nothing to this group is just as amazing
> as Roy's insistence on trying to make a name for himself by posting
> about Microsoft. You both should be admired and feared.
Sounds like a self-fulling idictment, doesn't it? (See #45 above).
--
HPT
|
|
