In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Hadron
<hadronquark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:05:08 +0200
<g7a186$ns4$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> "Moshe Goldfarb." <brick_n_straw@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:49:21 -0500, Rick wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:07:35 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:49:58 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> KDE 3.5.10 to be released in August
>>>>
>>>> God help us....
>>>> Does this version actually work or is it another piker like KDE 4.x ?
>>>
>>> Well, bitch, why do you think a developer's release, like KDE 4.0 should
>>> be read for consumers?
>>
>> I think very few Linux programs are ready for consumers.
>> Evidently so do the consumers.
>
> Is Rick still defending KDE 4.0 as "not final"?
>
Well, I'm a little confused here.
http://www.kde.org/announcements/4.0/
appears to be the initial 4.0 announcement. Nothing
about it being a developers-only release, though there
is the little blurb under Libraries:
* Being built on Trolltech's Qt 4 library, KDE 4.0
can make use of the advanced visual capabilities and
smaller memory footprint of this library. kdelibs
provides an outstanding extension of the Qt library,
adding large amounts of high-level functionality
and convenience to the developer.
As a Pedant Point(tm), *no* software release is final unless
the software is dead. ;-) The W Windows system and the X10
Windows system come to mind (both having long since been
replaced by X11).
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Useless C/C++ Programming Idea #11823822:
signal(SIGKILL, catchkill);
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
|
|
