Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Microsoft Uses NDAs to Keep Many "Critical" Flaws Under the Rug

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Microsoft changing Patch Tuesday process

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft is to release fixes for a dozen serious vulnerabilities next 
| Tuesday, seven of them ranked critical. But the firm has also announced a 
| three-stage process to reducing the effects of future vulnerabilities.  
| 
| [...]
| 
| To receive the advance notice, firms must have “a significant Microsoft 
| customer base” and sign non-disclosure agreements promising to keep the 
| details secret.  
`----

http://vista.blorge.com/2008/08/09/microsoft-changing-patch-tuesday-process/


Days ago:

Microsoft's Patch Tuesday to hit users big and hard

,----[ Quote ]
| Patch Tuesday falls relatively late in the month of August 2008, and
| Microsoft has a bumper bundle of bulletins up its corporate sleeve, with no
| less than seven - count 'em, folks, that's seven - critical items.
`----

http://www.itwire.com/content/view/19911/1054/


Related:

Critical Vulnerability in Microsoft Metrics

,----[ Quote ]
| This is a small subset of all the vulnerabilities, because the
| vulnerabilities that are found through the QA process and the vulnerabilities
| that are found by the security folks they engage as contractors to perform
| penetration testing are fixed in service packs and major updates. For
| Microsoft this makes sense because these fixes get the benefit of a full test
| pass which is much more robust for a service pack or major release than it is
| for a security update.      
`----

http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/11/30/critical-vulnerability-in-microsoft-metrics/


Skeletons in Microsoft’s Patch Day closet

,----[ Quote ]
| This is the first time I’ve seen Microsoft prominently admit to silently
| fixing vulnerabilities in its bulletins — a controversial practice that
| effectively reduces the number of publicly documented bug fixes (for those
| keeping count) and affects patch management/deployment decisions.  
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=316


Beware of undisclosed Microsoft patches

,----[ Quote ]
| Forget for a moment whether Microsoft is throwing off patch counts
| that Microsoft brass use to compare its security record with those
| of its competitors. What do you think of Redmond’s silent patching
| practice?
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=527


Microsoft is Counting Bugs Again

,----[ Quote ]
| Sorry, but Microsoft's self-evaluating security counting isn't really a
| good accounting.
|
| [...]
|
| The point: Don't count on security flaw counting. The real flaw is
| the counting.
`----

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/security/microsoft_is_counting_bugs_again.html?kc=MWRSS02129TX1K0000535
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkiguKUACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4ongCgqVuSpef9C349RooOXYnSt53h
0qgAn1bJUbb1MhH4iFbv2fnWGKJZY/8n
=j5oZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index