-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
GPLv3 to reinforce FSF open-source license position?
,----[ Quote ]
| ...it's a myth that GPLv3, released in June 2007, is being ignored.
`----
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12/09/gplv3_update_blackduck/
Funambol's CEO sees AGPL as essential for FOSS in cloud computing's future
,----[ Quote ]
| "The future of software is in cloud computing," says Fabrizio Capobianco, CEO
| of Funambol, a company that provides mobile services. And if free and open
| source software (FOSS) is going to survive in that emerging market, he says,
| then the community needs to adjust by promoting greater use of the GNU Affero
| General Public License (AGPL), a license specifically crafted for software as
| a service.
`----
http://www.linux.com/feature/154696
Recent:
Do we need GPLv3?
,----[ Quote ]
| Regardless of opinion on the merits of the new GPL, the fact is it's
| here--and likely here to stay.
|
| In essence, copyleft is a complete reversal of traditional copyright values
| where the law sees software as a literary work under the Copyright, Designs
| and Patents Act 1988.
|
| [...]
|
|
| The result is a new version of the license that is much clearer in its scope
| and application. It also takes greater account of software patents. To
| prevent software owners using patents to impose additional terms on users,
| the license includes the use of any patents owned by copyright holders that
| fall within the scope of the software. The termination provisions are also
| made clearer and are now automatic instead of requiring a notice from a
| copyright holder.
|
| [...]
|
| Conversion from GPL version 2 to version 3 is increasing as existing open
| source applications seek to benefit from the improved certainty afforded by
| the new terms. That's not to say that version 2 is unenforceable, it will
| continue to exist and be used by those who prefer it, but version 2 and
| version 3 are incompatible. Thus a decision needs to be made by those
| organizations 'going open' as to how they would prefer their software to be
| made available--and soon.
`----
http://www.zdnetasia.com/insight/software/0,39044822,62047569,00.htm
GPLv3/AGPLv3 Adoption: If It Happened Too Fast, I'd Be Worried
,----[ Quote ]
| Since the release of GPLv3, technology pundits have been opining about how
| adoption is unlikely, usually citing Linux's still-GPLv2 status as (often
| their only) example. Even though I'm a pro-GPLv3 (and, specifically,
| pro-AGPLv3) advocate, I have never been troubled by slow adoption, as long as
| it remained on a linear upswing from release day onward (which it has).
`----
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/blog/2008/nov/13/gplv3-agplv3-adoption/
AGPLv3 Keeps Open Source Vibrant in Age of SaaS
,----[ Quote ]
| For all practical purposes, the AGPLv3 is a key advance for everyone involved
| in open source, regardless of if you are a software developer, Internet end
| user or enterprise end user. The AGPLv3 closes the ASP loophole and keeps the
| freedom of open source software alive, in the age of SaaS and hosted
| applications.
`----
https://fossbazaar.org/?q=content/agplv3-keeps-open-source-vibrant-age-saas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkk/mXoACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4qFQCgiUWfV3k2zJRQ+8njNUW/YlA6
BRIAn3gE170GOsRrGB5wDZ7moyEsMWnI
=Buo/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
