Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Fallacy of GNU/Linux Being 'Hard'


On 2008-12-09, Hadron <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Ezekiel" <somewhere@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> "JEDIDIAH" <jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
>> news:slrngjtl9o.9ua.jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> On 2008-12-09, Ezekiel <zeke@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "JEDIDIAH" <jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> news:slrngjtb8h.tgt.jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> On 2008-12-09, Gary M. Stewart <gmstewart1953@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:23:36 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
[deletia]
>>>> Would you consider installing a video driver that works to be one of 
>>>> these
>>>> mundane requirements. I installed Ubuntu (dual boot) last weekend. I have 
>>>> a
>>>> fairly new NVidia graphics card and it was S.L.O.W with the default 
>>>> driver.
>>>> So I go to NVidia to download the latest Linux driver.
>>>
>>>      Odd that I did not. This video card will also support the recently
>>> releasted h264 acceleration framework just released by nvidia.
>>
>> Good for you and /your/ hardware. Unlike you I can actually tell when the 
>> computer strains to update the screen and applications. The video driver or 
>> config from the original install sucked with /my/ video card. I could 
>> couldn't care less about useless techno-political arguments and simply 
>> wanted the best possible video driver and that's the one from NVidia.
>
> Jebediah is a liar. he has no clue about modern video HW and performance
> as been demonstrated by himself time and time again.

    ...you would like to think that. Although it really isn't the point.
This is all a big fat red herring to get around the fact that you jokers
are incapable of selling Windows to the average Jane.

    It's really pathetic actually.

[deletia]
>> Some obvious lie? Exactly what part of my link to the *most current* NVidia 
>> instructions on their *current* web page to install the *most current* 
>> version of the Linux drivers is so confusing to you that you think it's a 
>> lie?
>
> Also, what part of "Debian support refuse to support people who use the
> NVidia installation" do the COLA "advocates" not understand.

      "Debian support"?

      Does that come with some sort of contract and an SLA? 

>
>>
>>
>>>     Also, the open nvidia driver performs reasonably well actually.
>>
>> I don't want "reasonably well" if I can have "extremely well" using the 
>> NVidia driver.
>
> You must remember that Jeb thinks multi head is useless. He is that
> clueless.

     No, just unproven by you.

>
>>
>>> It's certainly not as bad as any of the ATI drivers when it comes
>>> to performance (not that Jane would notice either way anyways).
>>
>> It was certainly /that bad/ with this video card. You could watch the 
>> repaints when moving or sizing windows on the screen. And guess what... once 

     Even a cheap lowend nvidia card with the open drivers aren't nearly
this bad.

>> I installed the NVidia driver it was instantaneous the way it should
>> be.
>
> Yup.
>
 
     The fact that two trolls agree on a lie doesn't make it any more true.

     Although... this is still all a red herring.

-- 


	The average IT manager is a less effective mentor than a 
Spongebob Squarepants cartoon.


 Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------     
                http://www.usenet.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index