Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Success Story for GNU Free Documentation License

  • Subject: [News] Success Story for GNU Free Documentation License
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:23:55 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
Who's behind Wikipedia?

,----[ Quote ]
| Over the past seven years it has grown to include over 250 language editions 
| with more than eight million articles, almost a quarter of which are in 
| English. According to Encyclopedia Britannica, Wikipedia is the world's 
| largest ever encyclopedia. Thanks to the GNU Free Documentation License that 
| covers all Wikipedia content, it is also the most open and free. But just who 
| is behind Wikipedia, and how does it work? Computerworld recently spoke to 
| Brianna Laugher, a Wikipedia editor and 2008 linux.conf.au presenter of 
| the 'Who's behind Wikipedia?' talk. Laugher was also a speaker at the 2007 
| international Wikimedia conference, Wikimania.        
`----

http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;1866322157;pp;1;fp;4;fpid;1968336438

Other unusual uses for the 'open source' approach:

Where open source is most vital

,----[ Quote ]
| Plumbing.
| 
| Open source is most vital in the plumbing of enterprise systems, moving data 
| back-and-forth, transforming it between formats. 
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=1981


Related:

Wikipedia: No Place for PR

,----[ Quoet ]
| Anyone assigned to manage a product or person's image is advised to tread 
| cautiously in this open source world. In January 2007, Microsoft was ordered 
| off Wikipedia when it was discovered that the company had paid a blogger to 
| tweak an entry for Microsoft Office Open XML format.   
| 
| As a form of punishment, Wikipedia published part of an e-mail from a 
| Microsoft employee to the Australian blogger, asking him to edit the article. 
| Policing the pages gets more complicated. What if it's not a company or a PR 
| agency? It depends on the bias of the editing.   
| 
| Bias on Wikipedia is not tolerated. Last year, the site banned for one week 
| edits coming from the IP addresses belonging to U.S. congressional staffers 
| when it was revealed that some had been editing and censoring articles about 
| elected officials. In the old days, governments used to ban the publication 
| of literature. In the Web 2.0 world, publishers are banning -- or at least 
| censoring -- the government.     
`----

http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Wikipedia-No-Place-for-PR-60812.html


Edit by Microsoft Corp.:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=3864532


Microsoft Hires Programmer to edit Wikipedia Entry For OOXML

http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/79130/index.html


Microsoft Program Manager: Wikipedia is a Giant Joke

,----[ Quote ]
| I am especially amused by all the bits in red font since they are
| either borderline libel or just straight up hilarious.
`----

http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=136975bc-b378-4408-bf7e-dbaa28fe21e6


Users insert virus source code into Wikipedia pages

,----[ Quote ]
| In an exclusive report, Wikinews has learned that on Wednesday, January 16, 
| 2008, two users, one anonymous and the other only known as MODX added code 
| onto Wikipedia for a computer virus known as the LoveLetter virus or the 
| ILOVEYOU virus.   
| 
| The users were inserting the VBScript code on various pages on Wikipedia 
| including the Wikipedia Sandbox, a page used for testing Wikicode without 
| causing errors on other pages.Users insert virus source code into Wikipedia 
| pages   
`----

http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Users_insert_virus_source_code_into_Wikipedia_pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index