In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:09:41 +0000
<1674172.rGQ6IOJzLD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> ____/ The Ghost In The Machine on Monday 04 February 2008 23:51 : \____
>
>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Linonut
>> <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote
>> on Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:05:19 -0500
>> <4IMpj.65946$vt2.25882@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> * The Ghost In The Machine peremptorily fired off this memo:
>>>
>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Moshe Goldfarb
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> GCC 4.2.3 Released
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Already on my machines, boss!
>>>>>
>>>>> Well now we know for sure you are on Roy Schestowitz's
>>>>> "paid for spamming" payroll.
>>>>> Thanks for confirming it!
>>>
>>> The only thing you've confirmed is that you are an idiot who doesn't
>>> know when he's plonked.
>>>
>>>> Too much choice. We should just stick to Microsoft Visual
>>>> Studio C++ and have done with it; their compiler is the
>>>> most standard one out there.
>>>>
>>>> (FSVO "compiler", "most", "standard", and "out there".)
>>>
>>> I've also got a gcc 3.2 and gcc 4.1 installed. Apparently you need a
>>> version 3 compiler for QEMU.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, I know...and even then, it fails miserably on my
>> laptop. Some issue apparently with the -mtune=pentium4m;
>> coughs up some ugly assembly code and quits.
>
> I suppose you're still on Gentoo, right? How long does it take you to compile
> OOo 2.3.x?
>
I'd have to look. A few hours, at least.
My general MO is that I compile at home while I'm at work, and
I can reverse that, compiling at night here at work while
I'm at home. I don't keep that exact track.
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Useless C/C++ Programming Idea #12398234:
void f(char *p) {char *q = strdup(p); strcpy(p,q);}
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|