LEE Sau Dan <danlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>>>> "Troy" == Troy Kirkland <kirk@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> >> After examining the contents of the EULAs, the NCC also said
> >> that some contained potentially unfair clauses.
>
> Definitely.
>
>
> Troy> I think the right thing to do here is for Adobe, Microsoft,
> Troy> Symantec, etc to refund some vouchers to customers who
> Troy> bought these products.
>
> Vouchers? So that the customers will fill into the same pits _again_?
>
> No. No vouchers. Cash, please. People paid real money and they
> should be refunded real money. Not non-cashable pieces of paper.
>
I agree. Vouchers are, at best, a complete insult. In the UK,
consumers have the right to get their money back under a wide range of
conditions. Unreasonable contracts are definitely one. And that was
money, not vouchers...
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/ |
| Cola trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
| My (new) blog: http://www.thereisnomagic.org |
|
|
