"Thufir" <hawat.thufir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:leHuj.64359$FA.9271@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:26:33 -0800, Tim Smith wrote:
>
>> This is the user violation.
>>
>> You download GPL code, you tweak it for your own operation, you
>> maintain the tweak solely for your own use, but you don't share the
>> tweak, either for a market advantage, out of ignorance, or from pure
>> laziness.
>>
>> How do we enforce the GPL against users without causing a backlash?
>
>
> That's not a violation of the GPL.
In other words, you're admitting that the link Roy Schestowitz provided is
utter bullshit?
It seems to be because it's Roy's link where the author asks - "How do we
enforce the GPL against users without causing a backlash?"
A clueless author cited by a clueless unemployed Spamowitz.
>
> -Thufir
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
