Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Microsoft Brings Intellectual Monopoly Propaganda to Children

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] Microsoft Brings Intellectual Monopoly Propaganda to Children
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:19:37 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
[And they say IPR, not "copyrights", so software patents are thrown in the same
bag of poo.]

Threat Of Jail Time Increases Respect For Copyright, Microsoft Says

,----[ Quote ]
| It's not clear whether Microsoft's statement to teen respondents -- "When you 
| do not follow these rules you are open to significant fines and possibly jail 
| time" -- is entirely accurate, particularly when teens under the age of 18 
| are involved. Emily Berger, an intellectual property fellow at the Electronic 
| Frontier Foundation, is skeptical. "I think it's being used as a scare 
| tactic," she said. "It's a real stretch of the law to say it's theoretically 
| possible."      
`----

http://informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=206503467

Microsoft training youth to love intellectual property

,----[ Quote ]
| Take, for example, its commitment to help teenagers understand the importance 
| of respecting intellectual property (read: giving Microsoft more money). It 
| just put out a survey showing that when kids understand the rules of 
| copyright, they're "less likely to download illegally."   
| 
| [...]
| 
| The one thing it didn't explain to teens is why they should retrofit 
| 20th-century copyright laws onto 21st-century realities. Digitization is a 
| fact. The web is a fact. Intellectual property is not the same as real, 
| tangible property, and should be treated and monetized differently.   
`----

http://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13505_1-9871636-16.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=TheOpenRoad

More on a new Microsoft propaganda:

More Choice

,----[ Quote ]
| On the other hand it is notable that the choice propaganda is just 
| unilateral. Microsoft does not offer customers of their products to choose 
| between ODF and OOXML.  
`----

http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-41210/more-choice


Related:

The list of Microsoft's US software patents covering OOXML

,----[ Quote ]
| US20060271574A1 Exposing embedded data in a computer-generated document
| US20060259854A1 Structuring an electronic document for efficient 
| identification and use of document parts 
| US20060206794A1 Method and apparatus for maintaining relationships between 
| parts in a package 
| US20060190815A1 Structuring data for word processing documents
| US20060149785A1 Method and Apparatus for Maintaining Relationships Between 
| Parts in a Package 
| 
| [...]
`----

http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-39421/the-list-of-microsoft-s-us-software-patents-covering-ooxml


Torvalds: Microsoft is bluffing on patents

,----[ Quote ] 
| "...They have been sued for patents by other people, but I don't think 
| they've -- not that I've gone through any huge amount of law cases -- but I 
| don't think they've generally used patents as a weapon," Torvalds said. "But 
| they're perfectly happy to use anything at all as fear, uncertainty and doubt 
| in the marketplace, and patents is just one thing where they say, 'Hey, isn't 
| this convenient? We can use this as a PR force.'"     
| 
| [...]
| 
| Microsoft's recent work around improving its platform's interoperability with 
| Linux left Torvalds largely unmoved. 
| 
| "I think there are people inside Microsoft who really want to improve 
| interoperability and I also think there are people inside Microsoft who would 
| much rather just try to stab their competition in the back," he said. "I 
| think the latter class of people have usually been the one[s] who won out in 
| the end, but -- so I wouldn't exactly trust them."     
`----

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/020408-torvalds-microsoft-is-bluffing-on.html


Microsoft patents by Brian Jones

,----[ Quote ]
| For fun we just did a quick search of published US patent applications 
| with "Brian Jones" as an author, and "Microsoft" as the assignee. 
| 
| [...]
| 
| Some of these, like the packing ones, seem to apply directly to OOXML. What 
| isn't clear to us is why Microsoft would pursue patent protection for patents 
| rights that their are promising that they won't assert over users of OOXML.  
`----

http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-35323/microsoft-patents-by-brian-jones


Digging in the Comments: Patents

,----[ Quote ]
| Patent licensing is probably the most important aspect for all third parties 
| that want to implement or use the Open XML specification. Unfortunately the 
| Ballot Resolution Meeting cannot discuss these aspects because only technical 
| and editorial issues would get resolved.   
| 
| [...]
| 
| When you have a patent which covers Open XML and you refuse to license it, 
| the standard process gets stalled. Large companies in the standardization 
| process are reluctant to use that nuke option. Given the ambush that the 
| software patent practice means today it is quite possible that Open XML 
| infringes a patent and all parties eventually have an obligation to license 
| it.     
`----

http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-31491/digging-in-the-comments:patents


Patent threat looms large over OOXML

,----[ Quote ]
| "If OOXML goes through as an ISO standard, the IT industry, government and 
| business will encumbered with a 6000-page specification peppered with 
| potential patent liabilities" said NZOSS President Don Christie.  
| 
| "Patent threats have already been used to spread doubt amongst organisations 
| keen to take advantage of the benefits of open source. No one knows whether 
| such claims have any merit, but it is calculated to deter the development and 
| use of open and alternative toolsets."   
`----

http://nzoss.org.nz/node/179


Cyberlaw OOXML Seminar 14 December

,----[ Quote ]
| However, this raises the issue - what assurance does a developer have that 
| such a large specification is not the subject of third party patent claims?  
|       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| The pedigree of the specification is certainly no reason for hope, Microsoft 
| has been the target of third party patent claims for some time now including 
| some high profile losses in patent suits. The fact that the specification has 
| been developed behind closed doors and on a fast track means that there has 
| been no adequate opportunity to evaluate the likelihood of third party patent 
| claims against the specifications. The sheer size of the document suggests 
| there will be at least a couple hiding in there somewhere.       
`----

http://brendanscott.wordpress.com/2007/12/13/cyberlaw-ooxml-seminar-14-december/


ISO warned about possible patent violations of DIS29500 (aka OOXML)

,----[ Quote ]
| I have just send the following email to ISO members (you can find some of 
| their email addresses on the INCTIS website) to warn them about the possible  
| patent ambush... 
`----

http://jeremywang67.blogspot.com/2008/01/iso-warned-about-possible-patent.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index