Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] How Microsoft and Its ECMA Proxy Steal Citizens' Rights

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] How Microsoft and Its ECMA Proxy Steal Citizens' Rights
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:43:04 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
Why the OOXML Vote Still Matters: A Proposal to Recognize the Need for “Civil
ICT Standards”

,----[ Quote ]
| In this way, standards can protect – or not – the rights of the individual to 
| fully participate in the highly technical environment into which the world is 
| now evolving.  Among other rights, standards can guarantee:  
| 
|     * That any citizen can use any product or service, proprietary or open, 
|       that she desires when interacting with her government. 
|     * That any citizen can use any product or service when interacting with 
|       any other citizen, and to exercise every civil right. 
|     * That any entrepreneur can have equal access to marketplace 
|       opportunities at the technical level, independent of the market power 
|       of existing incumbents.  
|     * That any person, advantaged or disadvantaged, and anywhere in the 
|       world, can have equal access to the Internet and the Web in the most 
|       available and inexpensive method possible.  
|     * That any owner of data can have the freedom to create, store, and move 
|       that data anywhere, any time, throughout her lifetime, without risk of 
|       capture, abandonment or loss due to dependence upon a single vendor.  
`----

http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080224143425160

Monday morning: OOXML BRM tidbits

,----[ Quote ]
| The ECMA resolution proposals are just some possible ways of dealing with the 
| comments. If there is not time to deal with all the comments then maybe, just 
| maybe, people might realize that OOXML should not be in the Fast Track 
| process. Of course, there has been evidence for that from the beginning.   
`----

http://www.sutor.com/newsite/blog-open/?p=2075


Related:

OOXML is too hard to implement … even for Microsoft

,----[ Quote ]
| So various things could be true here:
| 
|     * Microsoft is not putting proper resources behind maintenance of Office 
|       2004 for the Macintosh. 
|     * The software engineers working on Office 2004 for the Macintosh aren’t 
|       very good. 
|     * OOXML at 6000+ pages is just too hard a specification for expert 
|       software engineers working closely with the people who designed OOXML 
|       to be implemented easily and completely.  
`----

http://www.sutor.com/newsite/blog-open/?p=2069


,----[ Quote ]
| "[Microsoft:] For example, we should take the lead in establishing a common
| approach to UI and to interoperability (of which OLE is only a part). Our
| efforts to date are focussed too much on our own apps, and only incidentally
| on the rest of the industry. We want to own these standards, so we should
| not participate in standards groups. Rather, we should call 'to me' to the
| industry and set a standard that works now and is for everyone's
| benefit. We are large enough that this can work."
`----

http://www.os2site.com/sw/info/comes/px09509.zip


Microsoft admits Swedish employee promised incentives for Open XML support

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft Corp. admitted Wednesday that an employee at its Swedish subsidiary 
| offered monetary compensation to partners for voting in favor of the Office 
| Open XML document format's approval as an ISO standard.  
`----

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9033701


Corrupt countries were more likely to support the OOXML document format

,----[ Quote ]
| Is this just a random coincidence? The median of the CPI index of the above 
| mentioned 70 countries is 3.95. Of the most corrupted half (CPI index less 
| than 3.95) 23 or 77% voted for approval (approval or approval with comments) 
| and 7 or 23% for disapproval; 5 abstained. Of the least corrupted half (CPI 
| index more than 3.95) 13 or 54% voted for approval and 11 or 46% voted for 
| disapproval; 11 abstained - see the table below.      
`----

http://www.effi.org/blog/kai-2007-09-05.en.html


Microsoft accused of more OOXML standards fiddling 

,----[ Quote ]
| However the 11 new countries are refusing to say how they will vote. These 
| include Cote d'Ivoire, Cyprus, Ecuador, Jamaica, Lebanon, Malta, Pakistan, 
| Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Uruguay and Venezuela. Most people seem to think 
| that these have been put there by Vole to make sure the standard gets pushed 
| through.    
`----

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=42106

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index