On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:18:43 -0500, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:54:55 -0800, Tim Smith wrote:
>
>> In article <24587767.vkvgJOoX8X@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Tim harlowmoneys is seen as part of the "anti-ODF gang". I'll write about it
>>> tomorrow. He has something coordinated there, like most shills and Microsoft
>>> partners and it's starting to come loose.
>>
>> Post some proof, Roy.
>
> Not to mention, *NOBODY* is anti-odf, not even Microsoft. Yet every one of
> Microsoft's competitors in the office arena is actively anto-ooxml.
>
> Microsoft, Tim, myself, or anyone else are not against ODF, when we say
> things like "ODF does that too", we're saying you're being a hypocrite,
> Roy. Not that ODF is bad because it does that.
I'm not anti ODF.
I think it's a good idea.
> So please stop trying to portray this as you 'defending' ODF. It doesn't
> need defending.
Especially by an inept moron like Roy Schestowitz.
Hear Roy Schestowitz here, and please bring your no doze.
http://www.linux.com/feature/122470
If you don't want to listen to the entire affair, Roy Schestowitz comes
across like a moron.
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
|
|
