Mark Kent wrote:
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> ____/ Mark Kent on Thursday 17 January 2008 18:11 : \____
>>
>>> Jim Richardson <warlock@xxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:12:23 +0000,
>>>> Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Jim Richardson <warlock@xxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:06:18 +0000,
>>>>>> Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:08:33 +0000, Mark Kent wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does Kier work for the BBC?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is Mark an idiot or just round the bend?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course I don't work for the BBC, you loon! I have in fact stated
>>>>>>> several times on various posts what I do for a living, and is has
>>>>>>> zero to do with the BBC or MS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mark has issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Can't see what was wrong with that question, myself. It is perfectly
>>>>> reasonable. For kier, and yourself, to react in that way indicates
>>>>> where the issues are - they are obviously not with me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Clearly, the answer to this question is either "yes" or "no". Neither
>>>>> you, nor Kier, seem able to achieve this. Instead, you are trolling,
>>>>> Jim. Now, why would you be trolling me?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kier clearly stated that he *doesn't* work for the BBC, you even quoted
>>>> him saying so in the above section. Do you even read the posts you
>>>> reply to ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> He stated that after I asked it, but not before a stack of abuse, as you
>>> can see. If you can explain to me how asking Kier if he works for the
>>> BBC shows that I "have issues", then I'll consider your explanation. It
>>> still looks a lot like trolling to me.
>>>
>>> I don't expect you to be able to explain why he was abusive - I know the
>>> answer, he's trolling for a response. He is a troll, plain and simple,
>>> as is proven above.
>>
>> No, he is not a troll.
>
> Kier says:
>>>>>>> Is Mark an idiot or just round the bend?
>
> in response to (paraphrasing) does he work for the BBC? This *is*
> trolling, Roy!
Nope.
You could as well have asked "does he still beat his wife"
It is equally pointless.
His answer was very appropriate to your "question". And yes: You are an
idiot. And not just "round the bend"
< snip more pure lunacy >
--
If you had any brains, you'd be dangerous.
|
|
