Verily I say unto thee, that Linonut spake thusly:
> * Tim Smith peremptorily fired off this memo:
>> In article <6821805.6ENA1eWviO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roy Schestowitz
>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Probably the software at the callcenter in Microsoft... there
>>> ought to be some data checking/validation. Is it sensible for
>>> someone who takes the call to respond a decade later? No warning?
>>> No restriction on range?
>>
>> How does Linux call center software handle this?
>
> That would depend on the particular package, wouldn't it?
I would think that a followup set to *10 years* should set off a warning
on *any* reasonably designed CRM.
--
K.
http://slated.org
.----
| "[Microsoft] are willing to lose money for years and years just to
| make sure that you don't make any money, either." - Bob Cringely.
| - http://blog.businessofsoftware.org/2007/07/cringely-the-un.html
`----
Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) on sky, running kernel 2.6.23.8-63.fc8
12:10:12 up 26 days, 9:46, 2 users, load average: 0.09, 0.27, 0.27
|
|