Mark Kent wrote:
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> ____/ Peter Köhlmann on Sunday 13 January 2008 20:02 : \____
>>
>>> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:26:44 -0600, thad05@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why would they need Microsoft's permission to publish a Tomcat
>>>>>> benchmark?
>>>>>
>>>>> I suppose if they are running Tomcat on Windows it might fall under
>>>>> the benchmarking clauses of the Windows EULA.
>>>>
>>>> What clauses might those be? Have you actually read the Windows EULA?
>>>> There is no such clause.
>>>
>>> http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/02/1751222
>>>
>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/29/microsoft_vista_eula_analysis/
>>>
>>> http://gnu.org.in/pipermail/linuxers/Week-of-Mon-20021111/033147.html
>>>
>>> http://borsboards.com/archive/?view=28156
>>>
>>> http://www.gripe2ed.com/scoop/story/2006/4/28/0851/56993
>>>
>>> ...
>>> Many more
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Care to lie more now, Erik Funkenbusch?
>>
>> Just killfile that liar. He's not worth your time.
>>
>> Recent:
>>
>> "According to the Vista user agreement (EULA), because the OS contains
>> "one or more components" of the .Net Framework 3.0, users can conduct
>> internal benchmarking of those components, but can't disclose the
>> results of those benchmarks--or measurements to compare rival
>> products--unless they comply with conditions found at a Microsoft Web
>> site"
>>
>> http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,127719-c,vistalonghorn/article.html
>>
>
> When Erik starts to tell the truth, we'll know that it's safe for us to
> retire, as our job will be completed.
>
And then we start scanning the sky for flying pigs...
--
This message was sent from a
computer which is guaranteed
100% free of the M$ Windoze virus.
-- PCLinuxOS 2007 --
|
|
