Tim Smith wrote:
> In article <fmj77v$ain$03$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Peter Kohlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > People who know how to use a browser can easily find all the relevant
>> > into. That leaves you out. If you can demonstrate that you've finally
>> > figured out how to follow links, I can give you some. (Of course, when
>> > they show you are wrong, you'll just come back with your usual claim
>> > that the links didn't work...).
>> >
>>
>> Translation: You have no links and made your claims up out of full cloth
>
> Peter, almost every time I've given you a link for the last several
> months, you've claimed you can't follow it.
Wrong. I have said so *one* time
And it was a broken link. I told you I can't be arsed to stitch it manually,
if you are unable to provide working links as everyone else is able to do
So, just stop this bullshit about "several times". You are getting nearly as
bad as Hadron Quark with your made up claims
> If you want, though, you can yourself go to boycottnovell, select the OLPC
> articles, and see what Roy has said.
Good. Provide the link.
No, I will not hunt for something you just /claim/ to exist. I assume that
you are lying. Prove me wrong, this time
--
Get the new Windows XP. Now with eXtra Problems included
|
|
