Alternative Operating Systems – Part four
,----[ Quote ]
| A typical desktop of FreeBSD does not differ greatly from what one would see
| on a Linux based OS. This is because FreeBSD is the OS and not the GUI. GUIs
| which work on Linux are generally the ones which will be used on a BSD
| system. These include Gnome, KDE, Enlightenment, FluxBox, and many more.
`----
http://www.antiguasun.com/paper/?as=view&as=view&sun=281935077507132005&an=381709088501142008&ac=Special%20Feature&shwef=440724126901152008&pstamp=AS&CFID=30362389&CFTOKEN=60510300&jsessionid=98306a3de03648356f6c
http://tinyurl.com/2mmacv
Wackypedia: the Wikipedia fork
,----[ Quote ]
| The closest that the Linux kernel has come to forking, was during the
| famous “Linus does not scale” incident that began on 28 September1998 with
| the innocent question:
|
| Am I the only one for whom 2.1.123 fbcon.c doesn't compile?
|
| and culminated with Linus losing it:
|
| Go away, people. Or at least don't Cc me any more. I'm not interested, I'm
| taking a vacation, and I don't want to hear about it any more. In short, get
| the hell out of my mailbox.
`----
http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1006041
What a gentleman.
Related:
DesktopBSD 1.6 Release Notes
,----[ Quote ]
| This document contains notes regarding DesktopBSD 1.6, such as information
| about changes made since previous releases, a list of included software and
| currently known problems. Please consult this document before reporting bugs.
`----
http://desktopbsd.net/index.php?id=88
A quick overview of Desktop BSD 1.3
,----[ Quote ]
| I'd give DesktopBSD a gracious 8/10 with two points being deducted for
| work that still needs to be done. It's very usable now, but could
| still serve to grow just a little bit. So if you want to start using
| it now, feel free to. It's ready to go, and the best part is, it
| only stands to get better as time goes on!
`----
http://www.raiden.net/?cat=2&aid=229
NetBSD: An Alternative to Linux
,----[ Quote ]
| When many people think of free operating systems, or Unix like
| operating systems. The first thing that comes to many people minds
| is Linux. It's not the only free operating system, though it gets a
| lot of press. Open Source is about having a choice, not a
| dominating operating systems war.
`----
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/203109/netbsd_an_alternative_to_linux.html
Comparing GNU/Linux and FreeBSD
,----[ Quote ]
| FreeBSD and GNU/Linux are two great options: choosing one or the
| other depends on many factors. Usually FreeBSD is used as a web
| server: companies like Yahoo! or Sony Japan trust FreeBSD to run
| their internet portals; on the desktop GNU/Linux wins this battle,
| but GNU/Linux is used on many web servers as well. Users will find
| if they are familiar with traditional UNIX systems they can use
| either without many problems. FreeBSD and Linux: a gift of
| quality, robustness, security and stability from the free
| software community to the world of operating systems.
`----
http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/comparing_linux_and_freebsd
FreeSBIE -- first (and mostly negative) impressions
,----[ Quote ]
| At this point, I've run about 15 or so live Linux CDs with varying
| degrees of success. And yes, I have manually configured a static
| networking connection before -- Fluxbuntu's "command line interface
| is EVERYTHING" philosophy sent me to the Web for instructions on
| how to do so.
`----
http://www.insidesocal.com/click/2007/04/freesbie_first_and_mostly_nega.html
Review: PC-BSD 1.3
,----[ Quote ]
| PC-BSD's hardware support is good, but not quite on par with that of
| some Linux distributions. Part of this may be that BSD lacks some
| of the drivers available for Linux, and part of it seems to be
| related to the configuration utilities for PC-BSD. For example,
| PC-BSD seems to see my wireless card, but doesn't provide any
| tools (at least that I could find) to manage the card, supply a
| WEP password, or otherwise change the card's configuration.
|
| [...]
|
| On my Ubuntu desktop, I can plug in a USB soundcard and configure
| it to handle certain tasks (such as running Skype) and use my
| system soundcard for other tasks. I didn't see any way to manage
| multiple soundcards through the tools provided by PC-BSD.
|
| In short, PC-BSD is a bit behind Linux in hardware support. For
| standard desktops, its hardware support is probably sufficient.
| For some laptops or more complex hardware scenarios (such as
| multiple soundcards) it may require some advanced configuration.
`----
http://distrocenter.linux.com/article.pl?sid=07/01/09/1426257&tid=127&tid=13
PC-BSD 1.3: Day 1
,----[ Quote ]
| I hate to lose all my credibility in my first post, but FreeBSD makes
| a great console OS, since I have never gotten Xfree to configure
| properly on any desktop or laptop I have owned. I would spend a
| few hours researching the problem, then think "Linux is easier"
| and wipe the drive.
|
| That said, the allure of BSD remains: fast, modern, capable of
| running on just about anything from toasters to mainframes, and
| less fragmented than Linux. What's not to love?
|
| Projects like DesktopBSD and PC-BSD are perfect for the likes of
| me: someone that wants to get a BSD desktop running, but doesn't
| want to spend alot of time doing it.
`----
http://aweekwith.blogspot.com/2007/01/pc-bsd-13-day-1.html
GNU/Solaris - the Free OS of the Future?
,----[ Quote ]
| We'll have to wait and see what happens, but this looks a positive
| step in the direction of Freedom by Sun.
`----
http://www.libervis.com/article/gnu_solaris_the_free_os_of_the_future
|
|
