Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Windows Vista SP1 Renders Some More Hardware Obsolete

  • Subject: Re: [News] Windows Vista SP1 Renders Some More Hardware Obsolete
  • From: "[H]omer" <spam@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:12:18 +0000
  • Bytes: 2495
  • In-reply-to: <17659721.TA6cMLcbYB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Openpgp: id=BF436EC9; url=http://slated.org/files/GPG-KEY-SLATED.asc
  • Organization: Slated.org
  • References: <17659721.TA6cMLcbYB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071114 Remi/2.0.0.9-1.fc6.remi Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:593629
Verily I say unto thee, that Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:

> http://apcmag.com/7790/vista_sp1_needs_new_hardware

.----
| ATI’s new products – the Radeon 3870 and 3850 – do support DirectX
| 10.1, but NVIDIA apparently has no plans to release a DirectX
| 10.1-capable GPU.
|
| ...
|
| So gamers have a difficult choice to make – go with NVIDIA and be
| restricted to DirectX 10, or travel the ATI path and get enhanced
| gaming visuals.
`----

Like I said in another thread, ATi is increasingly the choice for
gamers, and this is just one of many reasons why. They were first
to bat with support for Compiz (GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap), and
again the first with a Free Software initiative (nVidia is on the
fence with that one).

Perhaps now even the *Windows* users will understand who the real
front-runner is, and why. That extra fps means nothing if there's
no support for your software.

-- 
K.
http://slated.org

.----
| "[Microsoft] are willing to lose money for years and years just to
|  make sure that you don't make any money, either." - Bob Cringely.
|  - http://blog.businessofsoftware.org/2007/07/cringely-the-un.html
`----

Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) on sky, running kernel 2.6.23.8-63.fc8
 13:10:03 up 24 days, 10:45,  1 user,  load average: 4.38, 4.32, 4.39

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index