Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [Rival] Early Signs of Trouble for Longhorn (Windows Server 2008)?

  • Subject: Re: [Rival] Early Signs of Trouble for Longhorn (Windows Server 2008)?
  • From: Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:43:11 -0800 (PST)
  • Complaints-to: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Injection-info: u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.177.54.5; posting-account=h7S-HwoAAABvl-Ws44QsNRqAxyQTcQj5
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: http://groups.google.com
  • References: <1487415.cvdvBPD98X@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • User-agent: G2/1.0
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:593128
On Jan 12, 8:10 am, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Microsoft web developers branded pants
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | The strokers of beards and Volish nay-sayers have been claiming that reason
> | is Windows Server 2008. They claim this on the very safe assumption that
> | since Microsoft installed it, vole.com has been running like a condemned man
> | with his legs cut off on his way to his own execution.  
> `----
>
> http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/01/11/microsoft-web-...

You forgot to read the entire article...

--------------------------------------------------
He said the Vole can pat itself on the back that it is not its
flagship server product that is responsible for the problem. It is
more likely to be its flagship webdevelopers who should be collecting
their P45s and pink slips.
---------------------------------------------------

--
Tom Shelton

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index