Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Windows Proprietary Technology Getting Used Against Firefox

  • Subject: [News] Windows Proprietary Technology Getting Used Against Firefox
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:20:44 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
Firefox and the Enterprise: An Uneasy Fit

,----[ Quote ]
| In the past, Firefox faced two main obstacles among enterprise users: its 
| immaturity, and its incompatibility with corporate Web applications and 
| intranets that relied on Microsoft technologies such as ActiveX.  
| 
| [...]
| 
| An even bigger problem is that Mozilla hasn't formally tested and certified 
| either of the two tools. 
| 
| "It's absolute FUD to say that you can't administer Firefox well within an 
| Active Directory environment with third-party tools," Ebron said, using the 
| acronym for "fear, uncertainty and doubt."  
| 
| [...]
| 
| Vendor Resistance
| 
| Mozilla has no plans to more tightly integrate Firefox and Active Directory, 
| according to Chris Hofmann, the open source vendor's director of special 
| projects. He dismissed Active Directory as a "proprietary technology" that 
| would hurt rather than help Firefox administrators.   
| 
| "Multiple levels of permissions applied across different groups adds a lot of 
| complexity," he said. "If you look at the track record for that feature, it's 
| resulted in less security for IE."  
`----

http://www.linuxinsider.com/rsstory/61369.html


Related:

Microsoft ruling may not bolster Europe's new case, warns lawyer

,----[ Quote ]
| The new investigation into Microsoft will look into whether it is legal for a 
| company with its market dominance to include web browser Internet Explorer 
| with its Windows operating system. It will also look at whether the operating 
| system allows for enough interoperability with other companies' software.   
`----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/21/eu_microsoft_analysis/


EU round two: Commission probing Microsoft conduct on new issues 

,----[ Quote ]
| ...I doubt Microsoft's legal team is surprised by this. After the September 
| ruling on the first EC case, I asked Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith 
| whether any additional features of Windows could fall under the same scrutiny 
| that Windows Media Player received. Smith said:   
| 
| "I think that it's fair to say that features that the commission regards as 
| being present in competing applications may be subject to the kind of 
| scrutiny the media player was put under. We basically went through that kind 
| of process already for Windows Vista. For example, there was a lot of 
| scrutiny on the desktop search feature, on the encryption feature, on the 
| various security features in general, on the new file format for portable 
| documents and that's probably a fairly indicative list of the kinds of 
| features that one would predict they'd focus on in the future..."       
`----

http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/techtracks/2008/01/eu_round_two_commission_probing_microsoft_conduct.html


Interview with ECIS's Thomas Vinje Regarding Opera's Complaint

,----[ Quote ]
| So that is one of the issues Opera is bringing to the EU Commission, that 
| consumers are being held back by Microsoft's long history of extending 
| standards with proprietary alterations/additions/tweaks and refusing or 
| neglecting to support web standards. Mr. Vinje also speaks about Silverlight 
| and I really hope the EU Commission looks into what bundling Silverlight 
| could do to the Internet.     
| 
| The other issue Opera is raising, of course, is bundling, which is what makes 
| it possible for a monopoly to ignore standards others would like them to use. 
| While it's unknown if the EU Commission will care about standards as an 
| antitrust issue, the bundling issue is very much more straightforward, as Mr. 
| Vinje explains...    
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071219231703353


Lights out for Silverlight

,----[ Quote ]
| The next point is the availability of the tools. Even though you can 
| view Silverlight on OS X, you will have no chance of being able to 
| author Silverlight content without a Windows licence. This is a 
| conscious decision. On the one hand, Microsoft wants to get 
| designers using their Expression toolset yet designers will have 
| to come across to the Windows platform in order to do it. It may 
| not be such a large hurdle but it is a hurdle nevertheless. Ever 
| tried to force an OS X user onto Windows? They cry, they scream 
| and they want their (at times) consistent GUI back.
`----

http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/Lights-out-for-Silverlight/0,130061733,339278334,00.htm
http://tinyurl.com/27jpuv

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index