Hadron wrote:
> Thufir <hawat.thufir@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:41:07 +0000, Mark Kent wrote:
>>
>>
>>> It's as daft as RIM getting sued for "email on wireless" when telco
>>> operators had been doing the same thing over satellite and radio links
>>> for years, as had amateur radio operators, or pretty much anyone with a
>>> wifi link, although they came much later.
>>
>>
>> What was the outcome on that, legally? Does RIM have a patent on e-mail
>> over a wireless network? I can only assume so, as there are no
>> blackberry knockoff's of which I'm aware.
>
> Huh? What rubbish are you talking now? No email on a wireless network?
> This would come as a BIG shock to millions of people around the world
> using their PDA-phone in Wifi hotspots.
Theres really nothing like a healthy reading comprehension problem, isn't
it, "true linux advocate", "kernel hacker", "emacs user", "swapfile
expert", "X specialist", "CUPS guru", "USB-disk server admin", "defragger
professional", "newsreader magician", "hardware maven", "time coordinator"
and "email sage" Hadron Quark, aka Hans Schneider, aka Richard, aka Damian
O'Leary
--
Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a way of life.
|
|
