On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:37:40 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> ____/ Mark Kent on Friday 25 January 2008 16:04 : \____
>
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> ____/ nessuno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Friday 25 January 2008 00:01 : \____
>>>
>>>> On Jan 24, 12:18 pm, "chrisv" <chr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Ignore the fscking Kohlman twat, who's harassing you!
>>>>> Keep up the good work, Roy!
>>>>>
>>>
> mms://a232.v87252.c8725.g.vc.akamaistream.net/7/232/8725/v0001/msnent.download.akamai.com/8725/DBA90618/published/Video/Projects/High/rodstewart_illstandbyyou_cr_intl_1009.wmv
>>>>
>>>> You must have hit a sensitive nerve, the trolls are swarming all over
>>>> the place. Of course, 95% of them are flatfish sockpuppets.
>>>
>>> I received some E-mails in the past couple of days. I'm being told by
>>> sources that are reliable that I hurt Microsoft where it really hurts the
>>> company so the levels of the attacks rose. I have filters here and in Digg,
>>> so I don't notice much of it. These are attempts to distract, getting me
>>> emotional or having me write back in rage (for trolls to use to discredit
>>> further). Not everyone would fall for it...
>>
>> What was the prompt for this?
>
> I brought up the issue of abuse floods (not just in COLA). This came just
> shortly after there was a traffic surge in BN.com. Doug took a look at the
> logs to see if Microsoft's PR agents were at it again. I know Novell keeps
> track of the site, but recently I've brought out some facts that are very
> damaging to Microsoft. I have more coming, but not enough time to edit and
> collect the links.
>
> Microsoft has been getting caught with its pants down quiet a lot recently.
Once again, Roy spews without a shred of proof.
At some point it will catch up with you Roy because it goes way beyond
slinging hash in COLA.
Even if you win, you will be crushed financially due to litigation.
You know full well I am a proponent of free speech, and I would defend you
and your gang's right to speak your opinion to the end.
I really would.
However, when you post articles which are damaging to mega sized companies
and you post them from the perspective of being truth, you are at some
point going to be asked to provide that proof.
IOW at the level at which you are posting, you are going to attract
attention from those who will be on a mission to destroy you.
Is this that foreign a concept for you Roy?
Or are you so full of yourself that you think you are untouchable?
For example, what would you do if Novell, Microsoft filed a lawsuit against
you claiming damage to their brand name and loss of business due to your
various boycott sites?
Even if they lost, they would crush you with litigation just like insurance
companies crush the little old lady trying to make a claim against one.
You may fancy yourself a hero in the movement but I'll tell you for a fact
that when it starts getting hot, your friends are going to disappear
because this cause is just not *that* important to them.
Think about it.
And BTW this isn't meant to scare / silence you or to make you stop
posting.
I don't care one way or the other, I am simply saying that it is in your
best interest to have some concrete proof ready to go, when you post some
very serious accusations.
|
|
