On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:40:26 -0500, Damp Squid wrote:
> "Moshe Goldfarb" <brick.n.straw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:9jfnqge53mlp$.17pczvbf2eio1$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:14:14 -0500, Damp Squid wrote:
>>
>>> I just gots to know because most of these "advocates" here are dumber
>>> than
>>> dirt.
>>>
>>> First we have the dumbo-twins "Mark Kent" and "AZ Nomad" claiming that
>>> the
>>> same binaries can't run across different versions of Windows. These
>>> idiots
>>> completely ignore the real-world applications out on the web that have
>>> been
>>> shown to them. But they still insist it can't be done although they don't
>>> have a shred of evidence to back them.
>>>
>>> Then we have the dishonest unemployed sewer scum "Roy Schestowitz"
>>> posting
>>> lies on Digg and then using his own blog as "proof" that his paranoid
>>> conpiracy theories are real.
>>>
>>> http://digg.com/security/Windows_Vista_s_one_year_security_report_will_surprise_you
>>>
>>>
>>> How stupid and dishonest do you need to be in order to qualify as a
>>> "Linux
>>> advocate" these days?
>>
>> Only in COLA for the most part.
>>
>> Real Linux advocates don't behave like the pond scum, lying hypocrites and
>> so called "Linux Advocates" in comp.os.linux.advocacy.
>>
>> That's one reason why COLA is considered the rectum of USENET by most real
>> Linux advocates.
>>
>> And Roy Schestowitz is their king!
>>
>> Hail Caesar!!
>>
>> Mark Kent is Drucilla!
>>
>> Or is it the other way around?
>
>
> You're probably right. The smart people and those with normal behavior
> probably post to the technical groups. The rejects that were thrown out of
> the tech groups for being too stupid slime their way over to COLA.
Exactly!
COLA was created for the *sole* purpose of siphoning off the scum from the
other legitimate Linux groups.
All the Linux bottom feeders ended up here.
|
|
