Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] The Big Lie of Microsoft (About Linux) and Faux 'Surveys'

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Is Linux Getting the Shaft?

,----[ Quote ]
| As I recently reported, there is an order of magnitude difference between the 
| market share of Linux "out there" in the world, and the market share of LInux  
| on Scienceblogs.com and on this very blog. Subsequently, I was trolled by my 
| very own brother "... so, when is Luniux going to reach 1% market share?...." 
| and this item has come out on ZDNet (which we all know is essentially funded 
| by Microsoft, right?): Linux - Still chasing that elusive 1% market share.    
| 
| [...]
| 
| So I went and looked. Here is the description of the database used by the 
| Market Share service that everyone seems to rely on: 
| 
| 
|     We collect data from the browsers of site visitors to our exclusive 
|     on-demand network of live stats customers. The data is compiled from  
|     approximately 160 million visitors per month. The information published 
|     is an aggregate of the data from this network of hosted website 
|     statistics. The site unique visitor and referral information is 
|     summarized on a monthly basis.     
| 
| WTF?
| 
| Is this supposed to be some kind of unbiased sample? But wait, there's 
| more...  
| 
| [More jaw-dropping s*ite]
| 
| 
| [...]
| 
| The complexity of this problem is actually rather large. But I can tell you 
| one thing: If you were my graduate student and you came to me with this 
| sampling strategy, I'd send you back to kindergarten. (If I had that power.)   
`----

http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/07/is_linux_getting_the_shaft.php?utm_source=sbhomepage&utm_medium=link&utm_content=channellink

When dealing with Microsoft and marketing companies, it's dealing with
criminal-minded liars. They use old propaganda techniques. They have always
done it, not just with paid AstroTurfers.


Recent:

Is Microsoft spamming websites to boost its numbers?

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft claims that it's all part of a quality control effort, but a rising
| number of web masters is complaining that Microsoft is trying to inflate its
| Live.com traffic delivery by spamming websites.
`----

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-9984574-16.html


Related:

Microsoft funding bankrupt Live Search experiment with porn spam

,----[ Quote ]
| Dear reader, please tell me: what do you think of a search engine that steals
| (bandwidth and AdSense revenue), lies, spams away, and is not clever enough
| to stop their criminal activities when they’re caught?
|
| Recently a Live Search rep whined in an interview because so many robots.txt
| files out there block their crawler...
`----

http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/microsoft-live-search-the-downfall-of-a-tiny-search-engine/


Microsoft’s Club Live fiasco

,----[ Quote ]
| People were using the macro on more than 3 games at a time, on more than 2
| accounts at a time, why Microsoft didn’t pick up on the fact that in the
| first few days some people had accumulated enough for 3 Zunes each is beyond
| us. Some were lucky, others, not so much.
|
| [...]
|
| So far no one has been banned from using their accounts, which they needed to
| sign up, probably because they did not break any laws, or probably because
| Microsoft didn’t want that hassle and liked their new found traffic.
`----

http://www.blogthe.net/2007/07/16/microsofts-club-live-fiasco/


Bots Helped To Boost Microsoft Live Search Gains

,----[ Quote ]
| In a blog post, Compete analyst Steve Willis attributed Microsoft's
| search gains to prizes awarded to users participating in Live Search
| Club, which features games that post queries to Microsoft's search
| engine.
|
| [...]
|
| Microsoft is essentially being DDoSed by thousands of people hundreds
| of times per minute, but they are mistaking this rise in traffic for
| people actually using Live Search."
`----

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201001092
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkh1DCcACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7wmwCaA0K1Zcjp3nDQR1HkHH3UQcfQ
clMAnjzpJcPPIysTu8GgH/vmqPUpo+WO
=yzEA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index