On 2008-07-01, The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Moshe Goldfarb.
><brick_n_straw@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote
> on Tue, 1 Jul 2008 15:21:34 -0400
><1az8zi9d79qk6.xmuv4qa74aot.dlg@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:42:59 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Why enterprise still cannot accept Linux.
>>
>> Because Windows has better applications, especially for the desktop.
>> Then you can add in the fragmentation of Linux and you can also include the
>> fact that the GPL scares the suits and their attorneys and there you have
>> it.
>>
>
> Moshe is entirely correct here, though "better" in this
> context might mean "more marketing money thrown at the
> media in order to sell them". I'd be curious as to whether
> Microsoft Word has any technical innovations, compared to
These Lemmings are hard pressed to give good reasons why I shouldn't
just ressurect some of my old ST software in this regard. The same applies
to pre-hegemony windows office software too.
[deletia]
--
My macintosh runs Ubuntu. |||
/ | \
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
|
|
