Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Ogg is Coming to Hundreds of Millions of PCs!!

In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 wrote
on Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:31:30 +0000
<1342915.qy80yjEaXV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> ____/ Matt on Thursday 31 July 2008 21:05 : \____
>
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>> 
>>> Firefox to Support Open Video Format in Next Release
>>> 
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>> | Chris Blizzard reports from this week?s Mozilla Summit: Firefox will
>>> | natively support the Ogg Theora video format!
>>> `----
>>> 
>>> http://internet.boredblogs.net/?p=2363
>> 
>> 
>> I suppose it's good news, but I don't know who is going to publish in a
>> format that can't be read by most people's preferred browser (IE).
>> 
>> What is the path to broad acceptance and interoperability?  People try
>> to play Ogg Theora content under IE, and they get a message saying they
>> need to install Firefox and Ogg?  They do so, and they like FF, and they
>> migrate from IE to FF?  Okay, but it seems that the content's usage will
>> suffer compared to content published using Flash.  I guess the content
>> will have to be published in both formats, with the Theora format
>> presented first.
>> 
>> Somebody please expound on how Theora is to reach critical mass (so to
>> speak) and how that will be an improvement over the current situation.
>
> There's now a better chance of it entering HTMLx, in which case Microsoft and
> Apple might get some feet-dragging.

See sections 4.7.7 through 4.7.9 (4.7.10 appears to be an API)
of:

http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#video

Theora/OGG is mentioned in 4.7.9 as an example.

In a more official (though still not stable) context, one
might look at sections 3.14.7 through 3.14.8, and 3.14.10:

http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-20080122/#video

[.sigsnip]

-- 
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows.  Multi-platform(1), multi-tasking(1), multi-user(1).
(1) if one defines "multi" as "exactly one".
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index