Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Benchmark: Office 2007 is a Resource Pig, Very Slow Compared to Predecessors

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] Benchmark: Office 2007 is a Resource Pig, Very Slow Compared to Predecessors
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:36:29 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.9
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Benchmarking Microsoft Word 95 through Word 2007

,----[ Quote ]
| Despite all the tweaks, tricks, hacks, and clever engineering, Microsoft's 
| latest version of Word is a step back in performance. That's generally true 
| of every new major release of any software. That's Wirth's Law. When Windows 
| 95 came out, people joking exaggeratedly that "95" was the number of floppies 
| Windows 95 shipped on. Though Windows 95 actually shipped on many fewer 
| floppies, the point is that Windows 95 was a huge, slower beast compared to 
| its predecessors. (Does anyone remember Windows 3.1, OS/2 Warp, and 
| DESQview?) There were similar complaints for XP, and Vista's performance was 
| the subject of the infamous "Vista Capable" class action lawsuit against 
| Microsoft.         
`----

http://www.oooninja.com/2008/07/benchmarking-microsoft-word-95-2007.html

Watch the graphs. The Munchkins love making fun of OOo performance, so they
ought to look at how a pig called Office quickly became an elephant.


Recent:

ODF Wins the Office Document Format War?

,----[ Quote ]
| Exactly why Microsoft is backpedaling its support for OOXML is not known. But
| open standards maven Andy Updegrove blogs that it may have something to do
| with Microsoft's current regulatory troubles in Europe and with the standards
| bodies that now govern OOXML. It appears likely that Microsoft actually can't
| implement a fully-compliant version of the standard just yet.
`----

http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,146162-c,unresolvedtechstandards/article.html


Huge Success for the ODF Community

,----[ Quote ]
| OpenOffice.org, which is just one implementation of ODF, is currently being
| downloaded more than 1.2M times per week and being distributed by popular
| hardware products like the Asus Eee PC. Government organizations around the
| world are adopting OpenOffice.org and/or ODF and have started to help each
| other with their adoption challenges. Thus, ODF has become a "market force"
| that can't be ignored anymore. Thus, again, congratulations and thank you to
| all the people who have contributed to the success of OpenOffice.org and ODF
| so far! Well done!
`----

http://blogs.sun.com/dancer/entry/huge_success_for_the_odf


The Fall of Microsoft Office

,----[ Quote ]
| On the same day that the state of New York published a report supporting open
| formats for electronic documents, mighty Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) said that
| it would support the open-source ODF format in Office 2007. Redmond's own
| Open Office XML specification may be heading for the great Recycle Bin in the
| sky, never to come back.
|
| [...]
|
| I can't say that Google or Sun or anybody else just won a bigger share of the
| office software market, and if they did, it won't help their revenue or
| profits directly anyway. But it's clear as day that Microsoft just took a
| serious hit, and the impact may take a long time to make itself felt but it
| will come.
`----

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2008/05/27/the-fall-of-microsoft-office.aspx


Is Microsoft Office in trouble?

,----[ Quote ]
| And, now Microsoft isn't hurrying to support its own format, but it is moving
| to support PDF and ODF... Could it be that all those copies of Office 2007
| Microsoft boasts of selling are collecting dust at reseller and retailer
| warehouses instead of being used on office systems? Could users be sticking
| with their older copies of Office and when they do want to move to something
| newer, they're moving to OpenOffice and Google instead?
|
| Interesting isn't it?
`----

http://blogs.computerworld.com/is_microsoft_office_in_trouble


Microsoft can’t support Open XML

,----[ Quote ]
| If Microsoft can’t give users a compelling reason to switch from their old
| version of Office to Office 14 their cash-flow is going to slow down
| considerably.
`----

http://practical-tech.com/business/microsoft-cant-support-open-xml/


Is Office the new Netscape?

,----[ Quote ]
| One of the cornerstones of Microsoft's competitive strategy over the years
| has been to redefine competitors' products as features of its own products.
| Whenever some upstart PC software company started to get traction with a new
| application - the Netscape browser is the most famous example - Microsoft
| would incorporate a version of the application into its Office suite or
| Windows operating system, eroding the market for the application as a
| standalone product and starving its rival of economic oxygen (ie, cash). It
| was an effective strategy as well as a controversial one.      
|
| Now, though, the tables may be turning. Google is trying to pull a Microsoft
| on Microsoft by redefining core personal-productivity applications -
| calendars. word processing, spreadsheets, etc. - as features embedded in
| other products. There's a twist, though. Rather than just incorporating the  
| applications as features in its own products, Google is offering them up to
| other companies, particularly big IT vendors, to incorporate as features in
| their products.      
`----

http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2008/05/one_of_the_corn.php


Microsoft stock drops amid slumping sales

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft Corp., whose Windows software dominates the personal-computer
| market, fell 6.2 percent Fridayin Nasdaq trading after sales slumped, casting
| doubt on whether PC demand can hold up in a slowing economy. The software
| maker reported a 24 percent drop in sales of Windows last quarter and
| forecast earnings that may miss analysts' estimates.
|
| [...]
|
| "The risk is that Linux gets a foothold and then affects their long-term
| revenue significantly."
`----

http://www.sltrib.com/business/ci_9061263


Microsoft earnings post-mortem: The cash cows quiver

,----[ Quote ]
| I can’t help but wonder if the lackluster Windows/Office results also can be
| attributed to Microsoft brass’s complete and crazy obsession with Google (and
| taking over Yahoo) has resulted in no one minding the Windows store. Kevin
| Johnson, the head of Microsoft’s Platforms & Services division seems to be so
| laser-focused on the online-ad business these days that he almost seems to
| have forgotten Microsoft is still in the software business, too.
|
| Microsoft execs’ claims about walking away from the Yahoo deal are nothing
| more than bluster. A protracted hostile takeover bid is just going to
| distract not just employees in Microsoft’s online services business, but
| company management, too. It’s not a pretty picture.
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1362


Feeling the heat at Microsoft

,----[ Quote ]
| If I ask you who is Microsoft's biggest competitor now, who would it be?
|
| Ballmer: Open...Linux. I don't want to say open source. Linux, certainly have
| to go with that.
`----

http://www.news.com/Feeling-the-heat-at-Microsoft/2008-1012_3-6232458.html?tag=ne.fd.mnbc


A reminder of why Microsoft wanted Yahoo

,----[ Quote ]
| Henry Blodget at Silicon Alley Insider has posted Tuesday a good look at how
| Microsoft's Windows and Google's search will stack up by 2009. The results
| aren't necessarily surprising, but they're certainly interesting to see in
| print: By this time next year, Blodget predicts, Google search will pass
| Windows in total revenue.
`----

http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9943247-7.html


Is Microsoft Aura Fading?

,----[ Quote ]
| Yesterday's early relief rally reversed, and Microsoft's value has now fallen
| by more than $30 billion since it unveiled its bid for Yahoo on February 1.
`----        

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121004447596669953.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEUEARECAAYFAkiG+50ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6yTACXSLidwHRxPrHIKLFkQqoPzo49
+QCfWpJJ105YCFMD/1tS6QKmOdLKUMk=
=SBmk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index