-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Microsoft: No tech support for you
,----[ Quote ]
| So I called Microsoft (866-234-6020) hoping to get some of the free tech
| support for XP SP3 mentioned here. But I didn't qualify.
|
| The free support is for "installation and compatibility". In my case SP3
| installed fine so I don't qualify there. And compatibility doesn't seem to
| include SP3 being compatible with Windows Update.
|
| [...]
|
| I don't expect it to lead anywhere. For one thing, as you can see from the
| screen shots above, there is no error code, just a generic warning about "a
| problem". I checked the event logs and there were no error messages there
| either. Debugging errors without an error code is really hard, especially by
| email.
`----
I think it's time for some more Linux postings.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13554_3-9996314-33.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20
Related:
Microsoft's Genuine Advantage
,----[ Snippet ]
| A lot of managers are afraid to use Open Source Software, because it
| doesn't come with any support. Of course that isn't true. It is a classical
| piece of FUD. And then again, how much is support worth?
|
| [...]
|
| MS: Microsoft Support. Good morning, sir. Can I help you.
| IC: Windows displays some strange message on my screen.
| MS: What's the message, sir.
| IC: ReadStringFromInf: UpdSpGetLineText failed: 0xe0000102; Microsoft
| Windows is Not Present
| MS: May I have your product key, sir.
| IC: [gives completely valid product key]
| MS: Ok, sir. Can you please reboot your PC?
| IC: Will that solve the problem?
| MS: Please reboot your PC, sir.
| IC: Ok, ok, wait a minute.
| MS: Please call us again if you eXPerience any more problems. Have a
| nice day, sir. [click]
`----
http://thebeez.vnunetblogs.com/the_beez_speaks/2006/09/microsofts_genu.html
I work for MS but even I struggle to get a hot-fix
,----[ Quote ]
| The problem took 260 minutes to resolve from start to
| finish and an estimated 90 minutes of Ledgard's time,
| not including the time it took to write-up his problems...
| Still, the frustrations experienced by Ledgard give
| a salutary lesson that Microsoft's online product
| support is mediocre, at best, and will surely strike
| a chord with many long-suffering sys admins.
`----
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/24/ms_hot-fix_hell/
Microsoft Y2K bug circa 1998?
,----[ Quote ]
| On January 8th of this week my parents received a phone call which they
| dodged because the call was coming through at 11:00 p.m. at night.
|
| The next day they retrieved the voicemail message which was from Microsoft
| technical support calling me back to see if my problem has been resolved.
|
| [...]
|
| I remember in the past year or so when I called Microsoft and the problem was
| not resolved (BSOD after Microsoft patch) that Microsoft did call me back the
| next day to see if i made any progress in my little computer crises (which I
| though was super cool of them... I was really impressed)...
| but wait a second .... or wait 315,569,260 seconds ....
| Microsoft hadn't done this (call me back that is) the first time I called ...
| and I called many years ago.... but that must have been when I was living at
| home with my parents..... which is why they called me at my parents phone
| number.
`----
http://bicbickers.blogspot.com/2008/01/microsoft-y2k-bug-circa-1998.html
Which is better for technical support
,----[ Quote ]
| I have found in general that with open source support you often get
| more than what you pay for but with closed source support, by some of
| the biggest names in software, the support is often lacking in the
| value department. With open source asking for support has generally
| resulted in a solution within a week and I have never paid for it.
| However with closed source companies I have open tickets that have
| not been resolved in months. With open source I can communicate
| directly with the author(s) of the program and work closely with
| them to find a solution. Closed source on the other hand has just
| requested information, verified the bug and then informed us that
| the solution may be available in the next release of the program.
`----
http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/linux/locutus/archives/which-is-better-for-technical-support-13621
http://tinyurl.com/ygspn7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkiGRKIACgkQU4xAY3RXLo76zwCdF7Jbbt2l0Qi3NDYiJmU5M33p
iY4AoJF0leU1HMrtBEqoBbkAiBUMw/S0
=0K1m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
