Verily I say unto thee, that Mark Kent spake thusly:
> The most dangerous thing about this patent is that Verisign will be
> able to redirect anyone to pretty much anything (by claiming that x,
> y or z was a typo), and anyone trying to stop them from abusing this
> will be, (wait for it) abusing their patent...
>
> Essentially, they have a patent on putting entries into your DNS
> databases.
Or IOW they have a patent on network hijacking.
And certainly if a name doesn't resolve then it may well be a typo. Then
again it may just be a domain transfer glitch or other temporary error,
but whatever it is, that doesn't give Verisign the right to hijack the
network to spam people. DNS failure should /honestly/ and /accurately/
be indicated with an /error/ ... not spam.
Gah ... the United States of Advertising indeed.
--
K.
http://slated.org
.----
| 'When it comes to knowledge, "ownership" just doesn't make sense'
| ~ Cory Doctorow, The Guardian. http://tinyurl.com/22bgx8
`----
Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) on sky, running kernel 2.6.23.8-63.fc8
08:39:44 up 168 days, 5:15, 5 users, load average: 1.48, 1.07, 0.46
|
|