Philip wrote:
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>> Microsoft Blames Users for Vista Infections
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>> Microsoft wasn't going to let that comment go down undisputed and now
>>> claims that users are responsible for executing malicious code on
>>> their machines — at least according to TechNet blogger and Microsoft
>>> evangelist Michael Kleef, who insists that the number of infections
>>> found by PC Tools is an indication of poor user behavior. Read all
>>> about it at ZDNet.co.uk.
>> `----
>>
>> http://www.itsecurity.com/features/in-the-news-061108/
>
> Extreme deja vu here. I thought I saw this thread a few years ago before
> Vista.
Mention any problems with it, and the trolls will call you a liar. Yet
only after several years did XP run stably. I remember playing Command
and Conquer Generals, then having to reboot because applications
afterwards would randomly hang up. Now it doesn't do that and one can
cleanly exit the game.
Standard modus operandi is sell the software first, fix the bugs later,
whereas with open source, the bug fixes come right away.
It is total and pure crap that Linux is stable enough to use as a network
server, but not on a desktop. Those who purport so are full of it.
--
HPT
|
|
