On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:50:55 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:
> nessuno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <nessuno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> On Jun 12, 8:29 am, "Phil Da Lick!"
>><phil_the_lickREMOVETHISSPAMT...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>>> > On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:31:38 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>> >> Microsoft's own chip design blamed for Xbox 360 RRoD
>>>
>>> > More off topic SPAM from the Roy Schestowitz SPAM MACHINE.
>>>
>>> > Where is High Plains Thumper with his FAQ?
>>>
>>> Unneccessary. One of you trollites seems to be hellbent on impersonating
>>> the FAQ police.
>>
>> It's flatfish. He's getting back for the poster who's been dogging
>> him lately with his true identity and a list of his unsavory
>> characteristics. Whoever it is, I've got to give him credit, he sure
>> comes up with some inventive names (some stolen from flatfish himself).
>
> Gary's used so many nyms over the years, I suppose it's not too
> surprising that someone's been able to go through the list and re-use
> them.
IMO it's hardly surprising that the Flatfish troll has had its idiocy
backfire on it. "What goes around, comes around".
--
Using anonymous remailers suggests that the poster
is merely a troll, & not prepared to stand by what
they post. Ergo the posts are of little value.
In short, they are NOT worth reading to begin with.
|
|
