On May 22, 4:36 pm, JEDIDIAH <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2008-05-22, Ezekiel <c...@xxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "JEDIDIAH" <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >news:slrng3bs3q.rqn.jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> On 2008-05-22, Ezekiel <b...@xxxxx> wrote:
>
> >>> "JEDIDIAH" <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >>>news:slrng3b4ct.2pp.jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> On 2008-05-22, Ezekiel <b...@xxxxx> wrote:
>
> >>>>> "JEDIDIAH" <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >>>>>news:slrng3avhf.u23.jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>> On 2008-05-22, Ezekiel <b...@xxxxx> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> "JEDIDIAH" <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>news:slrng3au29.fs2.jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>>> On 2008-05-22, DFS <nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Ezekiel wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> "JEDIDIAH" <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> >>>>>>>>>> " > Microsoft tried to be Open but failed. Miserably. "
> [deletia]
>
> >>>>> If you think that traditional Unix isn't on life support then you're
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> one
> >>>>> delluding yourself.
>
> >>>> Windows solutions don't even have completely equivalent hardware
> >>>> yet.
>
> >>> I didn't say it was Windows that's killing Unix. You ought to try
> >>> reading
>
> >> ...silly troll. You make it sound like there's Linux specific server
> >> hardware out there...
>
> > Silly moron who can't read. I said no such thing. Only a complete moron
> > would interpret what I wrote that way.
>
> You're the moron.
>
> Before you can "kill" Unix you have to be able to completely replace it first.
>
> That still hasn't happened yet.
>
> Unfortunately for Microsoft there are still a lot of serious computing
> customers that use systems in ways that no Windows configuration can
> cope with.
>
What about Linux, NOT Windows? Stop focusing on Windows and start
focusing on the NON-Windows but also NON-Unix and NON-PROPRIETARY
systems.
Do you like the proprietary method?
|
|
