Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In a letter to shareholders, Yahoo defends its "no" to Microsoft and "yes"
> to Google
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | Once again, internet concern Yahoo defended its decision against a
> | Microsoft takeover to shareholders. The Yahoo leadership explained in a
> | letter to shareholders that the cooperation agreement with search engine
> | operator Google, is a much better deal.
> `----
>
> http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/110057/from/rss09
>
> Yahoo Rejected Microsoft Over Exclusivity Request
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | Even though Microsoft offered Yahoo a $9 billion deal to gain control of
> | its search business, Yahoo would have been stuck with Microsoft as a
> | search partner for ten years.
So its beginning to make a lot more sense. Micoshaft wanted to destroy
Yahoo$ at a fraction of the money that it would have taken to buy it out.
That means they have substantially subversive long term planners inside
micoshaft fully trained up and ready to buy up a company such as yahoo$ and
over the course of 10 years drain it completely step by step.
They must spend all their time sharpening their tools and their paperwork to
catch out the strongest of management that fall for their tricks.
Looks like Yahoo$ like Google$ is getting the jump on micoshaft's
plans and I bet if a lot more companies took the time and trouble
to look more carefully the wording of their proposales will revile
at the plans and reject any offering from Micoshaft that is short of
the full market valuation price.
> http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2008/06/26
yahoo-rejected-microsoft-over-exclusivity-request
|
|
