On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 12:19:15 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> Expert: White House Negligent on E-Mail
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
>| The White House e-mail troubles began in 2002 with a decision to upgrade
>| electronic message capabilities and move from Lotus Notes to Microsoft
>| Exchange.
>|
>| Prior to launching Microsoft Exchange for e-mail, there should have been
>| full-scale testing of an archiving system, e-mail experts said. In addition,
>| both the existing archiving system and a new one should have run at the same
>| time until the new system was fully proven.
> `----
>
> http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080303/white_house_e_mail.html?.v=1
>
> Heaps of examples below. Microsoft to E-mail is like Windows ME to a patient on
> a life support machine.
Why do you keep lying Roy? It's very clear from the text above that the
failure was with the *ARCHIVING* program. Microsoft does not sell an
Archiving system for Exchange, so it has to be a third party system.
|
|
