Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Why More Distributions and Desktop Environments is Better

  • Subject: [News] Why More Distributions and Desktop Environments is Better
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 07:12:07 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
[Tongue in Cheek:] Messiness is better

,----[ Quote ]
| Had KDE not removed the problem, I could have set up Xfce. Had Xfce not 
| solved the problem, I could turned to IceWM, Blackbox, Fluxbox, Afterstep or 
| any of a couple of dozen other desktops or window manager.  
| 
| By contrast, had we been running Windows, she would have had to endure the 
| problem, because only one desktop would be available for her (or perhaps I 
| would have had to re-install). But, under GNU/Linux, I had an immediate 
| choice of workarounds – and all because free software isn’t so rigidly 
| organized that it has only one of everything. The redundancy that people love 
| to decry makes an emergency far less urgent, so I, for one, hope that no 
| distribution every tries to do much tidying.       
`----

http://brucebyfield.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/messiness-is-better/


Related:

More distros = more choice

,----[ Quote ]
| With more than 300 active distributions (distros), Linux is on a roll. Linux 
| distros primarily differ in terms of features since they are built on 
| variants of the same kernel (32-bit/64-bit; with various features of the 
| kernel enabled or disabled). “All the Linux distributions come from the same 
| upstream kernel and what distinguishes each distribution is how they provide 
| support, get ISVs to certify the ISV applications on the specific 
| distribution, and how IHVs (Independent Hardware Vendor) get to do the same,” 
| feels Nandu Pradhan, President & Managing Director, Red Hat India.        
`----

http://www.expresscomputeronline.com/20080211/opensource03.shtml


Distros Don’t Drive Development

,----[ Quote ]
| Lots of press and people focus on Linux distributions when they check out 
| what happens in Linux land. This and that distro come in new releases and 
| they offer this and that brand new feature. This is also true of the many 
| linux podcasts. They give credit to distros for new things that pop up.   
`----

http://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2007/10/28/distros-dont-drive-development/


The distro jungle

,----[ Quote ]
| People who are new to Linux are often confused by the large number of
| distributions to choose from. The good news is that you can safely ignore 
| most of them. This article helps you choose a distribution for getting 
| started with your Linux exploration—and helps you understand just what 
| it is you've just chosen.
`----

http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-linux-distros/?S_TACT=105AGX59&S_CMP=GR&ca=dgr-btw01distrojungle


Ubuntu 7.10 & Fedora 8 Performance Compared

,----[ Quote ]
| The bottom line is with our hardware we had used and these common Phoronix 
| benchmarks, the performance of Fedora 8 and Ubuntu 7.10 was deadlocked. There 
| was no clear winner. If you are trying to decide between taking the Ubuntu or 
| Fedora route, you're best off looking at the distribution's features and what 
| they mean to you.     
`----

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=912&num=1


Schism

,----[ Quote ]
| When someone says a recent Linux Distro is 100 times better than another 
| recent Linux distro, I worry a little that schism has lead to computer 
| religion. Taken on its face, examined rationally, you have to ask "how can 
| that be?". They all feed off the same kernel stock, and pull in the same sets 
| of office projects and same GUI projects and so forth.    
`----

http://on-being-open.blogspot.com/2007/09/schism.html


Why Having 500+ Distros is a Good Thing

,----[ Quote ]
| Perhaps next time the author might think about what they're
| saying...because limiting the number of distros out there is
| absolutely NOT the way to go to accomplish anything other
| than limiting innovation.
`----

http://linux-blog.org/index.php?/archives/186-Why-Having-500+-Distros-is-a-Good-Thing.html


Staffing for Linux, not distribution X

,----[ Quote ]
| What doesn’t change is that you hired them to do what they’re doing: run 
| Linux - and the next step in generality is to first recognise that Linux, the 
| BSDs, and Solaris are all variations on a theme and then to conclude that 
| people who are good with one of these are likely to be equally effective with 
| the other two.    
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=912

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index