On Tuesday 04 March 2008 11:32 pm, Jim Richardson wrote in
comp.os.linux.advocacy:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:36:29 +0100,
> Hadron <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Jesper Lund Stocholm <jls2008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> "[H]omer" <spam@xxxxxxx> wrote in news:t4ju95-ojr.ln1@xxxxxxxxxx:
>>>
>>>> Jesper Lund Stocholm wrote:
>>>
>>>> I understand that "improving the text" may have been the formal
>>>> bureaucratic jargon for this process, but you are nonetheless greatly
>>>> understating the significance of this meeting, by continually trying
>>>> to distance delegates' participation from their opinions, with
>>>> platitudes.
>>>
>>> To be clear - this was a very important meeting indeed. I am not trying
>>> to say otherwise. All I am saying is that it was not about approving DIS
>>> 29500.
>>>
>>>> Regardless of the specific purpose of any given meeting, any vote
>>>> which furthers the successful ratification of OOXML is an idealogical
>>>> "vote" in its favour.
>>>
>>> Aaah - I think we finally see why we dissagree. It is here important to
>>> know that even those countries that have strong oppositions on OOXML all
>>> participated constructively in the sessions and out-of-meeting debates.
>>> They did not just sit on their hands and protest. They actively
>>> participated in improving the text.
>>
>> Whereas in COLA they stick their heads in the sand, wiggle their arses
>> in the air and "just say no". Pathetic isn't it?
>
>
> Hadron making more shit up.... or admitting he sticks his head in the
> sand an just says no?
He really is a bitter & twisted prat, isn't he.
--
Mandrake 2008.1 RC1
--On a 64bit system--
|
|
