Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail

____/ Linonut on Saturday 01 March 2008 16:14 : \____

> * Roy Schestowitz peremptorily fired off this memo:
> 
>> Showdown in Geneva: OOXML Fails to Achieve Majority Approval at BRM
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>| Many, many, people around the world have tried very hard to make the OOXML
>>| adoption process work.  It is very unfortunate that they were put to this
>>| predictably unsuccessful result through the self-interest of a single
>>| vendor taking advantage of a permissive process that was never intended to
>>| be abused
>>| in this fashion.  It would be highly inappropriate to compound this error
>>| by
>>| approving a clearly unfinished specification in the voting period ahead. 
>>| To paraphrase a former First Lady, it's time to "Just say No" to OOXML.
>> `----
>>
>>
http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080229055319727
> 
>    There are two ways in which you may hear the results of the BRM
>    summarized by those that issue statements and press releases in the
>    days to come.  Perhaps inevitably, they are diametrically opposed, as
>    has so often happened in the ODF - OOXML saga to date.  Those results
>    are as follows:
> 
>       98.4% of the OOXML Proposed Dispositions were approved by a three
>       to two majority at the BRM, validating OOXML
> 
>       The OOXML Proposed Dispositions OOXML were overwhelmingly
>       rejected by the delegations in attendance at the BRM,
>       indicating the inability of OOXML to be adequately addressed
>       within the "Fast Track" process
> 
>    In this blog entry, I will explain why the latter position is
>    the only supportable conclusion, and help you read the
>    various press releases and statements that may be made with
>    the benefit of the appropriate context.
> 
> All of the links Roy posted seem to (on a quick reading) show the
> various spins on the result.
> 
> No doubt we'll get some more spin from the COLA inhabitants.

Yes, I was going to post about it in a minute. They now change their tune.
Spin, spin, spin... but no ISO for the time being.

-- 
                ~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz      | Every beginning must start somewhere
http://Schestowitz.com  |     GNU/Linux     |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Swap:  1510068k total,   461256k used,  1048812k free,    68920k cached
      http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index