[H]omer wrote:
>> On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:10:03 -0400, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
>>> Again, Roy. *JAVA IS NOT A STANDARD OF ANY KIND*, other than
>>> de-facto.
>
>But Fuddie, surely that /is/ the Vole's definition of "standard".
Only if it's closed, secret, and proprietary.
|
|
